North British Railway Co. v. Budhill Coal and Sandstone Co. and Others [1908] ScotLR 178 (24 November 1908)
Sandstone, including its soft upper portions suitable for moulders' sand, is a mineral within the meaning of section 70 of the Railways Clauses Consolidation (Scotland) Act 1845, and the defenders' notice to work such minerals was not shown to be mala fide; thus, the pursuers are not entitled to declarator or interdict.
- Citation
- [1908] ScotLR 178
- Parties
- Pursuer: North British Railway Company; Defender: Budhill Coal and Sandstone Company and Others
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 24 November 1908
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Declarator and Interdict / Appeal (reclaiming Motion) Inner House, Court of Session
- Outcome
- Action dismissed; interlocutor of Lord Ordinary affirmed (majority decision, Lord Ardwall dissenting).
- Legal Topics
- Interpretation of 'minerals' Under Statutory Conveyance, Railways Clauses Consolidation (scotland) Act 1845, Reservation of Minerals in Conveyances, Good Faith in Statutory Notices to Work Minerals
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
North British Railway Company
Pursuer
Budhill Coal and Sandstone Company and Others
Defender
Procedural Posture
Civil Declarator and Interdict / Appeal (reclaiming Motion) Inner House, Court of Session
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether sandstone is a 'mineral' within the meaning of section 70 of the Railways Clauses Consolidation (Scotland) Act 1845
- 2 Whether the soft upper portion of a sandstone stratum, used as moulders' sand, is a mineral under the Act
- 3 Whether the defenders' notice to work minerals was given bona fide or mala fide
Ratio Decidendi
Sandstone, including its soft upper portions suitable for moulders' sand, is a mineral within the meaning of section 70 of the Railways Clauses Consolidation (Scotland) Act 1845, and the defenders' notice to work such minerals was not shown to be mala fide; thus, the pursuers are not entitled to declarator or interdict.
Court Disposition
Action dismissed; interlocutor of Lord Ordinary affirmed (majority decision, Lord Ardwall dissenting).
Orders
- Pursuers' action for declarator and interdict dismissed.
- Expenses awarded against the pursuers.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment