HILL OF RUBISLAW (Q Seven) Ltd v. RUBISLAW QUARRY ABERDEEN LTD & Ors [2013] ScotCS CSOH_131 (06 August 2013)
Clause 2.1 restricts the total net lettable floor area of office space that may be constructed on the northern quarry subjects, not merely that which is let or offered for let; the restriction is a valid real burden as it confers a praedial benefit on the neighbouring office blocks, protecting their rental value and lettability; the restraint is not unreasonable or contrary to public policy; the pursuers, as prospective purchasers under missives, have sufficient interest to seek declarator, but their substantive claims fail.
- Citation
- [2013] ScotCS CSOH_131
- Parties
- Pursuer: Hill of Rubislaw (Q Seven) Limited; Defender: Rubislaw House Limited; Defender: Marathon House Limited; Defender: Seafield House Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 06 August 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Declaratory Action (construction of Contract and Real Burden) / Outer House, Court of Session, Opinion
- Outcome
- Declarators refused; defenders assoilzied; plea of no title to sue repelled.
- Legal Topics
- Interpretation of Restrictive Covenants, Real Burdens Under Title Conditions (scotland) Act 2003, Restraint of Trade, Title and Interest to Sue, Declaratory Actions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Hill of Rubislaw (Q Seven) Limited
Pursuer
Rubislaw House Limited
Defender
Marathon House Limited
Defender
Seafield House Limited
Defender
Procedural Posture
Declaratory Action (construction of Contract and Real Burden) / Outer House, Court of Session, Opinion
Legal Issues
- 1 Proper construction of clause 2.1 of the minute of agreement regarding office space restriction
- 2 Whether clause 2.1 constitutes a real burden under the Title Conditions (Scotland) Act 2003
- 3 Whether the restriction is an unreasonable restraint of trade
Ratio Decidendi
Clause 2.1 restricts the total net lettable floor area of office space that may be constructed on the northern quarry subjects, not merely that which is let or offered for let; the restriction is a valid real burden as it confers a praedial benefit on the neighbouring office blocks, protecting their rental value and lettability; the restraint is not unreasonable or contrary to public policy; the pursuers, as prospective purchasers under missives, have sufficient interest to seek declarator, but their substantive claims fail.
Court Disposition
Declarators refused; defenders assoilzied; plea of no title to sue repelled.
Orders
- Refuse both declaratory conclusions sought by the pursuers.
- Assoilzie (absolve) the defenders from the conclusions of the summons.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment