European & International Investments Inc v McLaren Building Services Ltd & Anor [2001] ScotCS 67 (21 March 2001)
Clause 8.3B of the Scottish Minor Works Contract does not require the employer to insure against the consequences of the contractor's negligence, nor does it exclude the contractor's liability for negligence under clause 8.2. The provisions for joint names insurance do not, in themselves or in combination with other factors, import that the cover must extend to the contractor's negligence. The contractor remains liable for its own negligence unless expressly excluded.
- Citation
- [2001] ScotCS 67
- Parties
- Pursuer: European and International Investments Inc; First Defender: McLaren Building Services Limited; Second Defender: Another (Second Defender)
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 21 March 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Civil (reparation/contract) / Procedure Roll Discussion (interlocutory)
- Outcome
- Proof before answer allowed; no dismissal of action against first defenders at this stage.
- Legal Topics
- Interpretation of Standard Form Building Contracts, Joint Names Insurance, Contractual Indemnity, Negligence, Allocation of Risk in Construction Contracts
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
European and International Investments Inc
Pursuer
McLaren Building Services Limited
First Defender
Another (Second Defender)
Second Defender
Procedural Posture
Civil (reparation/contract) / Procedure Roll Discussion (interlocutory)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether clause 8.3B of the Scottish Minor Works Contract requires the employer to insure against loss or damage caused by the contractor's negligence, thereby precluding the employer's right to recover from the contractor for such loss.
- 2 Whether the existence of joint names insurance under the contract excludes the contractor's liability for negligence under clause 8.2.
Ratio Decidendi
Clause 8.3B of the Scottish Minor Works Contract does not require the employer to insure against the consequences of the contractor's negligence, nor does it exclude the contractor's liability for negligence under clause 8.2. The provisions for joint names insurance do not, in themselves or in combination with other factors, import that the cover must extend to the contractor's negligence. The contractor remains liable for its own negligence unless expressly excluded.
Court Disposition
Proof before answer allowed; no dismissal of action against first defenders at this stage.
Orders
- All parties allowed a proof before answer of their respective averments on record.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment