Chivas' Trustees v. Douglas [1900] ScotLR 38_199 (12 December 1900)
The term 'clergy of the Diocese of Aberdeen' as used in the bequest includes the bishop, clergy with incumbencies, those appointed to independent missions, curates or assistants to instituted clergy, and the supernumerary clergyman, whether from the former Diocese of Aberdeen or Orkney, but excludes retired clergy on pensions who no longer have stipends or active duties.
- Citation
- [1900] ScotLR 38_199
- Parties
- Trustees (applicants): Chivas' Trustees; Second Party (respondent): Bishop of the United Diocese of Aberdeen and Orkney; Third Parties (respondents): Thirty-eight clergymen instituted to charges within former Diocese of Aberdeen; Fourth Parties (respondents): Three clergymen holding licences and appointed to independent mission charges (Aberdeen); Fifth Parties (respondents): Two clergymen holding licences and acting as curates/assistants (Aberdeen); Sixth Parties (respondents): Three retired clergymen on Aged and Infirm Clergy Fund (Aberdeen); Seventh Party (respondent): Supernumerary clergyman (vacant office, represented by Bishop); Eighth Parties (respondents): Two clergymen instituted to charges (Orkney); Ninth Parties (respondents): Two clergymen holding licences and appointed to mission charges (Orkney)
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 12 December 1900
- Procedural Posture
- Special Case (interpretation of Testamentary Bequest) / Judgment (inner House, Second Division)
- Outcome
- Declaratory judgment specifying eligible beneficiaries under the bequest.
- Legal Topics
- Interpretation of Testamentary Bequests, Beneficiaries Under Charitable Trusts, Ecclesiastical Beneficiaries, Scope of 'clergy' in Legacy
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Chivas' Trustees
Trustees (applicants)
Bishop of the United Diocese of Aberdeen and Orkney
Second Party (respondent)
Thirty-eight clergymen instituted to charges within former Diocese of Aberdeen
Third Parties (respondents)
Three clergymen holding licences and appointed to independent mission charges (Aberdeen)
Fourth Parties (respondents)
Two clergymen holding licences and acting as curates/assistants (Aberdeen)
Fifth Parties (respondents)
Three retired clergymen on Aged and Infirm Clergy Fund (Aberdeen)
Sixth Parties (respondents)
Supernumerary clergyman (vacant office, represented by Bishop)
Seventh Party (respondent)
Two clergymen instituted to charges (Orkney)
Eighth Parties (respondents)
Two clergymen holding licences and appointed to mission charges (Orkney)
Ninth Parties (respondents)
Procedural Posture
Special Case (interpretation of Testamentary Bequest) / Judgment (inner House, Second Division)
Legal Issues
- 1 Who qualifies as 'clergy of the Diocese of Aberdeen' under the testatrix's bequest?
- 2 Does the bequest extend to clergy of the United Diocese of Aberdeen and Orkney?
- 3 Are retired clergy or those on the Aged and Infirm Clergy Fund entitled to share in the income?
Ratio Decidendi
The term 'clergy of the Diocese of Aberdeen' as used in the bequest includes the bishop, clergy with incumbencies, those appointed to independent missions, curates or assistants to instituted clergy, and the supernumerary clergyman, whether from the former Diocese of Aberdeen or Orkney, but excludes retired clergy on pensions who no longer have stipends or active duties.
Court Disposition
Declaratory judgment specifying eligible beneficiaries under the bequest.
Orders
- Declared that the bishop, instituted clergy, mission clergy, curates/assistants, supernumerary clergyman, and clergy from both former dioceses (Aberdeen and Orkney) are entitled to participate in the annual income; retired clergy on pensions are excluded.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment