Fulton & Ors v Muir [2017] ScotCS CSOH_25 (15 February 2017)
The disputed writing only created a bequest payable if Mrs Gray survived her husband. Since Mrs Gray died before Mr Gray, the condition was not purified and the legacy is not payable. The disputed writing was not impliedly revoked by the second codicil, and the executor's signature constituted approbation under the first codicil.
- Citation
- [2017] ScotCS CSOH_25
- Parties
- Pursuers: Robin David Fulton & Others; Defender: Keith Muir
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 15 February 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Proof Before Answer; Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Declarator granted in favour of pursuers; bequest not payable.
- Legal Topics
- Interpretation of Testamentary Documents, Conditional Bequests, Revocation of Testamentary Instruments
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Robin David Fulton & Others
Pursuers
Keith Muir
Defender
Procedural Posture
Civil / Proof Before Answer; Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an informal writing left by the testator constitutes a valid testamentary direction
- 2 Interpretation of the condition 'after my death & my husbands' in the disputed writing
- 3 Whether the disputed writing was impliedly revoked by a subsequent codicil
Ratio Decidendi
The disputed writing only created a bequest payable if Mrs Gray survived her husband. Since Mrs Gray died before Mr Gray, the condition was not purified and the legacy is not payable. The disputed writing was not impliedly revoked by the second codicil, and the executor's signature constituted approbation under the first codicil.
Court Disposition
Declarator granted in favour of pursuers; bequest not payable.
Orders
- Sustained pursuers’ first plea-in-law
- Repelled defender’s pleas
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment