KEVIN BROWN AGAINST THE SHORE PORTERS' SOCIETY OF ABERDEEN & OTHERS; ALAN DAVIDSON AGAINST THE SHORE PORTERS' SOCIETY OF ABERDEEN & OTHERS; SEAN SIMPSON AGAINST THE SHORE PORTERS' SOCIETY OF ABERDEEN & OTHERS [2021] ScotCS CSOH_25 (10 March 2021)
The grounds for expulsion in rule 16 are concerned with the conduct of working members only. However, the power of expulsion is exercisable in relation to a member for conduct committed as a working member, even if the expulsion is effected after the member has become superannuated, provided the conduct criterion is not satisfied. There is no immunity from expulsion merely by attaining superannuated status if expellable conduct as a working member is established.
- Citation
- [2021] ScotCS CSOH_25
- Parties
- Pursuer: Kevin Brown; Pursuer: Alan Davidson; Pursuer: Sean Simpson; Defender: The Shore Porters' Society of Aberdeen & Others
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 10 March 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Action (multiple Conjoined Actions) / Debate on Relevancy (preliminary Issue)
- Outcome
- Declarator refused on the first issue; power of expulsion extends to conduct as a working member, even if discovered after superannuation.
- Legal Topics
- Interpretation of Unincorporated Association Rules, Expulsion of Members, Superannuation Rights, Benevolent Society Governance
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kevin Brown
Pursuer
Alan Davidson
Pursuer
Sean Simpson
Pursuer
The Shore Porters' Society of Aberdeen & Others
Defender
Procedural Posture
Civil Action (multiple Conjoined Actions) / Debate on Relevancy (preliminary Issue)
Legal Issues
- 1 Does the power of expulsion in rule 16 of the Society's Rules apply only to working members or also to superannuated members?
- 2 Is the power of expulsion exercisable after a member has become superannuated, for conduct committed while a working member?
Ratio Decidendi
The grounds for expulsion in rule 16 are concerned with the conduct of working members only. However, the power of expulsion is exercisable in relation to a member for conduct committed as a working member, even if the expulsion is effected after the member has become superannuated, provided the conduct criterion is not satisfied. There is no immunity from expulsion merely by attaining superannuated status if expellable conduct as a working member is established.
Court Disposition
Declarator refused on the first issue; power of expulsion extends to conduct as a working member, even if discovered after superannuation.
Orders
- Case put out by order for discussion of interlocutor to give effect to the ruling and to address the outstanding amendment on the second issue.
- All questions of expenses reserved.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment