WILLIAM JOHN AUCHNIE & HENRY AUCHNIE v. DUNCAN HENRY JAMES AUCHNIE & GEORGE ALLAN AUCHNIE [2013] ScotSC 8 (05 February 2013)
Beneficiaries who elected to take farm assets under the Will are entitled to those assets and their fruits at date of death value; SFP entitlements and subsidies belong to beneficiaries, not the estate; executors are not obliged to account for asset value increases or farm income post-death; objections by pursuers repelled.
- Citation
- [2013] ScotSC 8
- Parties
- First Pursuer: William John Auchnie; Second Pursuer: Henry Auchnie; First Defender: Duncan Henry James Auchnie; Second Defender: George Allan Auchnie
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 05 February 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Count, Reckoning and Payment / Interlocutory Ruling on Objections and Answers; Continued to Hearing on Expenses and Further Procedure
- Outcome
- Pursuers' objections repelled; cause continued to hearing on expenses and further procedure.
- Legal Topics
- Interpretation of Wills, Beneficial Ownership, Valuation of Estate Assets, Single Farm Payment Entitlements, Distribution of Estate, Executor Duties
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
William John Auchnie
First Pursuer
Henry Auchnie
Second Pursuer
Duncan Henry James Auchnie
First Defender
George Allan Auchnie
Second Defender
Procedural Posture
Count, Reckoning and Payment / Interlocutory Ruling on Objections and Answers; Continued to Hearing on Expenses and Further Procedure
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Single Farm Payment (SFP) subsidies are estate income or belong to beneficiaries
- 2 Whether executors must account for increase in value of farms since date of death
- 3 Whether payments under wind turbine options agreement are estate assets
Ratio Decidendi
Beneficiaries who elected to take farm assets under the Will are entitled to those assets and their fruits at date of death value; SFP entitlements and subsidies belong to beneficiaries, not the estate; executors are not obliged to account for asset value increases or farm income post-death; objections by pursuers repelled.
Court Disposition
Pursuers' objections repelled; cause continued to hearing on expenses and further procedure.
Orders
- Repels pursuers' first plea in law (not insisted upon)
- Sustains pursuers' second plea in law and upholds objection 2 (by consent)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment