Adam (Colville's Factor) v. Nicoll and Others [1913] ScotLR 62 (21 November 1913)
The proviso in section 1 of the Intestate Moveable Succession (Scotland) Act 1855, limiting representation among collaterals to brothers' and sisters' descendants, applies to section 2. The right to collate and claim a share of the moveable estate under section 2 is not available to an heir in heritage who is not within the class defined in section 1. The sections must be read together as a unified scheme, and the contrary interpretation in Jamieson v. Walker is overruled.
- Citation
- [1913] ScotLR 62
- Parties
- Pursuer and Real Raiser: A. Y. Adam (Colville's Factor); Defender, Claimant and Reclaimer: Mrs Annie Bruce Adam or Nicoll; Defenders, Claimants and Respondents: Robert Adam and Others (including Mrs Annie Adam or Lister, Mrs Elizabeth Adam or Butchart, Mrs Mary Adam or Stark, Mrs Jessie Adam or M'Leish, William Robertson Adam, Agnes Milne Adam)
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 21 November 1913
- Procedural Posture
- Action of Multiplepoinding and Exoneration / Appeal (reclaiming Motion) Before Inner House, First Division, Court of Session (seven Judges)
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; interlocutor of Lord Ordinary recalled in part; Mrs Nicoll ranked and preferred to the whole moveable estate; Robert Adam entitled to the heritage only; claims of Robert Adam and his sisters to moveable estate denied.
- Legal Topics
- Intestate Succession, Collation, Representation Among Collaterals, Interpretation of Intestate Moveable Succession (scotland) Act 1855
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
A. Y. Adam (Colville's Factor)
Pursuer and Real Raiser
Mrs Annie Bruce Adam or Nicoll
Defender, Claimant and Reclaimer
Robert Adam and Others (including Mrs Annie Adam or Lister, Mrs Elizabeth Adam or Butchart, Mrs Mary Adam or Stark, Mrs Jessie Adam or M'Leish, William Robertson Adam, Agnes Milne Adam)
Defenders, Claimants and Respondents
Procedural Posture
Action of Multiplepoinding and Exoneration / Appeal (reclaiming Motion) Before Inner House, First Division, Court of Session (seven Judges)
Legal Issues
- 1 Does the proviso in section 1 of the Intestate Moveable Succession (Scotland) Act 1855, which limits representation among collaterals after brothers' and sisters' descendants, apply to section 2 of the Act?
- 2 Is an heir in heritage, not being among the next-of-kin or a descendant of a brother or sister of the intestate, entitled to collate and claim a share of the moveable estate under section 2?
Ratio Decidendi
The proviso in section 1 of the Intestate Moveable Succession (Scotland) Act 1855, limiting representation among collaterals to brothers' and sisters' descendants, applies to section 2. The right to collate and claim a share of the moveable estate under section 2 is not available to an heir in heritage who is not within the class defined in section 1. The sections must be read together as a unified scheme, and the contrary interpretation in Jamieson v. Walker is overruled.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; interlocutor of Lord Ordinary recalled in part; Mrs Nicoll ranked and preferred to the whole moveable estate; Robert Adam entitled to the heritage only; claims of Robert Adam and his sisters to moveable estate denied.
Orders
- Recall findings entitling claimants to be ranked and preferred on the moveable estate.
- Find Mrs Annie Bruce Adam or Nicoll entitled as sole next-of-kin to be ranked and preferred in terms of her claim.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment