John Graham v. Stirling and Another Robert Graham v. Stirling and Another [1922] ScotLR 165 (09 December 1922)
Reduction was competent as a method of review after implementation of decree and possession given up; Robert Graham had full authority from John Graham to act as sole tenant and give notice to terminate the tenancy, making the notice valid and effectual under the statute; agency need not be disclosed on the face of the notice if authority is established by facts.
- Citation
- [1922] ScotLR 165
- Parties
- Pursuer: John Graham; Pursuer: Robert Graham; Defender: James Stirling
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 09 December 1922
- Procedural Posture
- Action of Reduction of Decree of Removing / Inner House, First Division, Court of Session, Appeal From Lord Ordinary
- Outcome
- Defender assoilzied; pursuers' pleas repelled; interlocutor of Lord Ordinary recalled.
- Legal Topics
- Joint Lease, Termination of Tenancy, Notice to Quit, Tacit Relocation, Competency of Reduction, Agency Authority
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
John Graham
Pursuer
Robert Graham
Pursuer
James Stirling
Defender
Procedural Posture
Action of Reduction of Decree of Removing / Inner House, First Division, Court of Session, Appeal From Lord Ordinary
Legal Issues
- 1 Is reduction a competent method to review a decree of removing under the Judicature Act 1825?
- 2 Was the notice to terminate the tenancy by one joint tenant valid under the Agricultural Holdings (Scotland) Act 1908?
- 3 Did Robert Graham have authority to give notice on behalf of John Graham?
Ratio Decidendi
Reduction was competent as a method of review after implementation of decree and possession given up; Robert Graham had full authority from John Graham to act as sole tenant and give notice to terminate the tenancy, making the notice valid and effectual under the statute; agency need not be disclosed on the face of the notice if authority is established by facts.
Court Disposition
Defender assoilzied; pursuers' pleas repelled; interlocutor of Lord Ordinary recalled.
Orders
- Production satisfied; defender assoilzied from conclusions of the summons.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment