Martin v. Had-Fab Ltd [2004] ScotCS 36 (21 January 2004)
The court cannot rewrite the terms of a judicial tender regarding expenses after acceptance; the defenders are bound by their offer to pay expenses to the date of the new tender, and the pursuer is entitled to decree and expenses as specified.
- Citation
- [2004] ScotCS 36
- Parties
- Pursuer: James Edward Martin; Defender: Had-Fab Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 21 January 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Personal Injury Damages Action / Settlement Following Proof, Motion for Decree and Expenses
- Outcome
- Decree granted for the sum in the Minute of Tender; defenders found liable to the pursuer in expenses to the date of the new tender.
- Legal Topics
- Judicial Tender, Expenses, Settlement, Social Security (recovery of Benefits) Act 1997
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
James Edward Martin
Pursuer
Had-Fab Limited
Defender
Procedural Posture
Personal Injury Damages Action / Settlement Following Proof, Motion for Decree and Expenses
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court should award expenses to the pursuer to the date of the new tender despite a previous tender at the same gross value
- 2 Whether the court can alter the terms of a judicial tender regarding expenses after acceptance
Ratio Decidendi
The court cannot rewrite the terms of a judicial tender regarding expenses after acceptance; the defenders are bound by their offer to pay expenses to the date of the new tender, and the pursuer is entitled to decree and expenses as specified.
Court Disposition
Decree granted for the sum in the Minute of Tender; defenders found liable to the pursuer in expenses to the date of the new tender.
Orders
- Decree for £8,513.74 in favour of the pursuer
- Defenders to pay pursuer's expenses of process to the date of the Minute of Tender
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment