Petition by Rodney Vincent McAlister (Court of Session) [2024] CSOH 97 (31 October 2024)
Failure by petitioner to disclose material facts, specifically full access to accounting records and partners' meetings, rendered the ex parte appointment of interim judicial factor unsustainable; circumstances did not meet necessity test for such appointment in ongoing trading partnership.
- Citation
- [2024] CSOH 97
- Parties
- Petitioner: Rodney Vincent McAllister; Deceased Former Partner: David McAllister Senior; First Respondent: First Respondent (mother of petitioner); Second Respondent: Second Respondent (brother of petitioner); Third Respondent: Third Respondent (brother of petitioner); Fourth Respondent: Fourth Respondent (brother of petitioner); Interim Judicial Factor: Interim Judicial Factor: Lord Davidson of Glen Clova, Campbell
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 31 October 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Petition for Dissolution and Judicial Factor Appointment / Motion for Recall of Interim Judicial Factor
- Outcome
- Appointment of interim judicial factor recalled; respondents awarded expenses; petitioner liable for judicial factor's fees and outlays.
- Legal Topics
- Judicial Factor Appointment, Dissolution of Partnership, Full and Frank Disclosure, Urgent Remedies, Interim Orders
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rodney Vincent McAllister
Petitioner
David McAllister Senior
Deceased Former Partner
First Respondent (mother of petitioner)
First Respondent
Second Respondent (brother of petitioner)
Second Respondent
Third Respondent (brother of petitioner)
Third Respondent
Fourth Respondent (brother of petitioner)
Fourth Respondent
Interim Judicial Factor: Lord Davidson of Glen Clova, Campbell
Interim Judicial Factor
Procedural Posture
Petition for Dissolution and Judicial Factor Appointment / Motion for Recall of Interim Judicial Factor
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether full and frank disclosure was made by petitioner
- 2 Whether circumstances justified appointment of interim judicial factor
- 3 Whether remedy of interim judicial factor is necessary and proportionate
Ratio Decidendi
Failure by petitioner to disclose material facts, specifically full access to accounting records and partners' meetings, rendered the ex parte appointment of interim judicial factor unsustainable; circumstances did not meet necessity test for such appointment in ongoing trading partnership.
Court Disposition
Appointment of interim judicial factor recalled; respondents awarded expenses; petitioner liable for judicial factor's fees and outlays.
Orders
- Recall of interim judicial factor appointment
- Respondents awarded expenses against petitioner
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment