Trump International Golf Club Scotland Ltd & Anor v The Scottish Ministers [2015] ScotCS CSIH_46 (05 June 2015)
The Court held that the Electricity Act 1989 does not require an applicant for section 36 consent to be a licence holder or exempt person; the licensing and consent regimes are distinct. There was no evidence of bias or pre-determination by the Scottish Ministers. Condition 14 was not void for uncertainty or...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2015] ScotCS CSIH_46
- Parties
- Petitioners and Reclaimers: Trump International Golf Club Scotland Limited and The Trump Organization LLC; Respondents: The Scottish Ministers; Interested Party: Aberdeen Offshore Wind Farm Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 05 June 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Reclaiming Motion in Judicial Review / Appeal (inner House, Court of Session)
- Outcome
- Reclaiming motion refused; interlocutor of Lord Ordinary affirmed.
- Legal Topics
- Judicial Review of Planning Consent, Electricity Act 1989 Interpretation, Bias and Pre Determination in Administrative Decision Making, Validity and Enforceability of Planning Conditions
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Trump International Golf Club Scotland Limited and The Trump Organization LLC
Petitioners and Reclaimers
The Scottish Ministers
Respondents
Aberdeen Offshore Wind Farm Limited
Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Reclaiming Motion in Judicial Review / Appeal (inner House, Court of Session)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether only licence holders or exempt persons can apply for consent under section 36 of the Electricity Act 1989
- 2 Whether the Scottish Ministers acted with bias or pre-determination in granting consent
- 3 Whether condition 14 attached to the consent is void for uncertainty or unenforceable
Ratio Decidendi
The Court held that the Electricity Act 1989 does not require an applicant for section 36 consent to be a licence holder or exempt person; the licensing and consent regimes are distinct. There was no evidence of bias or pre-determination by the Scottish Ministers. Condition 14 was not void for uncertainty or unenforceable when read with condition 13.
Court Disposition
Reclaiming motion refused; interlocutor of Lord Ordinary affirmed.
Orders
- Petitioners' reclaiming motion refused
- Interlocutor of Lord Ordinary dated 11 February 2014 affirmed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment