Stewart & Ors v Trafalgar House Steamship Company Ltd & Ors [2013] ScotCS CSOH_37 (05 March 2013)
Jurisdiction is determined at the time the action is raised based on the pleadings, and once established, it persists regardless of subsequent abandonment of claims against anchor defendants. The Scottish Court of Session retains jurisdiction over the English-domiciled defendants.
- Citation
- [2013] ScotCS CSOH_37
- Parties
- Pursuers: Mary Adamson Lorimer Stewart and Others; First Defender: Trafalgar House Steamship Company Limited; First Defender: Bruce Alexander Mackay and David Paul Hudson (Liquidators of Trafalgar House Steamship Company Limited); Second Defender: British India Steam Navigation Company Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 05 March 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Action for Damages / Jurisdictional Challenge
- Outcome
- Defenders' plea of no jurisdiction repelled
- Legal Topics
- Jurisdiction, Perpetuatio Fori, Irreconcilable Judgments, Article 6.1 Regulation (ec) 44/2001
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mary Adamson Lorimer Stewart and Others
Pursuers
Trafalgar House Steamship Company Limited
First Defender
Bruce Alexander Mackay and David Paul Hudson (Liquidators of Trafalgar House Steamship Company Limited)
First Defender
British India Steam Navigation Company Limited
Second Defender
Procedural Posture
Civil Action for Damages / Jurisdictional Challenge
Legal Issues
- 1 Does the Scottish Court of Session retain jurisdiction over English-domiciled defendants after abandonment of claim against Scottish-domiciled anchor defendant?
- 2 Is jurisdiction determined at the time of raising the action or can it be lost subsequently?
Ratio Decidendi
Jurisdiction is determined at the time the action is raised based on the pleadings, and once established, it persists regardless of subsequent abandonment of claims against anchor defendants. The Scottish Court of Session retains jurisdiction over the English-domiciled defendants.
Court Disposition
Defenders' plea of no jurisdiction repelled
Orders
- Court retains jurisdiction over remaining defenders
- Action may proceed against English-domiciled defendants
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment