MARTIN CLARK & Anor v. TRIPADVISOR LLC FOR AN ORDER UNDER THE ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE (SCOTLAND) ACT 1972 SECTION 1(1)(A) [2014] ScotCS CSOH_20 (06 February 2014)
Section 1(1A) of the Administration of Justice (Scotland) Act 1972 does not confer jurisdiction on the Scottish Court of Session to order disclosure from parties outside Scotland, as the Act is limited in extent to Scotland and contains no contrary intention to rebut the presumption against extra-territorial effect. Furthermore, the exclusive jurisdiction clause in TripAdvisor's terms of use is comprehensive and covers the present dispute, requiring such matters to be resolved in Massachusetts.
- Citation
- [2014] ScotCS CSOH_20
- Parties
- Petitioners: Martin Clark and another; Respondents: TripAdvisor LLC
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 06 February 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Petition for Order Under Administration of Justice (scotland) Act 1972 Section 1(1 A) / Jurisdictional Challenge; Decision on Petition
- Outcome
- Petition refused; plea-in-law for respondents sustained.
- Legal Topics
- Jurisdiction, Disclosure of Information, Forum Selection Clauses, Extra Territoriality, Defamation Via Internet
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Martin Clark and another
Petitioners
TripAdvisor LLC
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Petition for Order Under Administration of Justice (scotland) Act 1972 Section 1(1 A) / Jurisdictional Challenge; Decision on Petition
Legal Issues
- 1 Does section 1(1A) of the Administration of Justice (Scotland) Act 1972 confer jurisdiction on the Scottish Court of Session to order a party outside Scotland to disclose information?
- 2 Does the exclusive jurisdiction clause in TripAdvisor's terms of use preclude the Scottish court from making such an order?
Ratio Decidendi
Section 1(1A) of the Administration of Justice (Scotland) Act 1972 does not confer jurisdiction on the Scottish Court of Session to order disclosure from parties outside Scotland, as the Act is limited in extent to Scotland and contains no contrary intention to rebut the presumption against extra-territorial effect. Furthermore, the exclusive jurisdiction clause in TripAdvisor's terms of use is comprehensive and covers the present dispute, requiring such matters to be resolved in Massachusetts.
Court Disposition
Petition refused; plea-in-law for respondents sustained.
Orders
- Prayer of the petition refused.
- All questions of expenses reserved.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment