Norfor and Others v. Education Authority of County of Aberdeen [1923] ScotLR 553 (13 July 1923)
The Court held that section 18(4) of the Education (Scotland) Act 1918 does not exclude the jurisdiction of the Court to determine questions of law regarding the construction of the statutory obligation to maintain transferred schools. Only questions of fact as to due fulfilment or observance are referred to the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [1923] ScotLR 553
- Parties
- Pursuer: Robert Thomas Norfor, C. A., Edinburgh, as secretary and treasurer of the Representative Church Council of the Episcopal Church in Scotland and others; Defender: Education Authority for the County of Aberdeen
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 13 July 1923
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Appeal (reclaiming Note) From Interlocutor of Lord Ordinary
- Outcome
- Reclaiming note allowed; plea of incompetency repelled; case remitted to Lord Ordinary to proceed.
- Legal Topics
- Jurisdiction of Courts, Statutory Reference to Government Department, Arbitration Under Statute, Interpretation of Education (scotland) Act 1918
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Robert Thomas Norfor, C. A., Edinburgh, as secretary and treasurer of the Representative Church Council of the Episcopal Church in Scotland and others
Pursuer
Education Authority for the County of Aberdeen
Defender
Procedural Posture
Civil / Appeal (reclaiming Note) From Interlocutor of Lord Ordinary
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the jurisdiction of the Court is excluded by section 18(4) of the Education (Scotland) Act 1918 in favour of the Scottish Education Department for questions regarding the maintenance of transferred schools.
- 2 Whether the question at issue is one of fact (fulfilment/observance) or law (construction of statutory obligation).
Ratio Decidendi
The Court held that section 18(4) of the Education (Scotland) Act 1918 does not exclude the jurisdiction of the Court to determine questions of law regarding the construction of the statutory obligation to maintain transferred schools. Only questions of fact as to due fulfilment or observance are referred to the Department. The reclaiming note was allowed, the plea of incompetency repelled, and the case remitted to the Lord Ordinary to proceed.
Court Disposition
Reclaiming note allowed; plea of incompetency repelled; case remitted to Lord Ordinary to proceed.
Orders
- The interlocutor of the Lord Ordinary dismissing the action is recalled.
- The third plea-in-law for the defenders is repelled.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment