M'Quilkin v. The Glasgow District Subway Co. [1902] ScotLR 39_328 (24 January 1902)
A third trial should not be granted where two juries have found for the pursuer on substantially the same evidence in a pure question of fact, and the pursuer is entitled to the expenses of both trials as the successful party.
- Citation
- [1902] ScotLR 39_328
- Parties
- Pursuer: Mrs Sarah M'Corkindale or M'Quilkin; Defender: The Glasgow District Subway Company
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 24 January 1902
- Procedural Posture
- Damages for Personal Injuries / Motion for New Trial After Second Jury Verdict
- Outcome
- Motion for new trial refused; pursuer awarded damages and expenses.
- Legal Topics
- Jury Trials, New Trial, Damages, Expenses, Contrary to Evidence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mrs Sarah M'Corkindale or M'Quilkin
Pursuer
The Glasgow District Subway Company
Defender
Procedural Posture
Damages for Personal Injuries / Motion for New Trial After Second Jury Verdict
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a third trial should be granted when two juries have found for the pursuer on substantially the same evidence
- 2 Whether the pursuer is entitled to expenses for both trials
Ratio Decidendi
A third trial should not be granted where two juries have found for the pursuer on substantially the same evidence in a pure question of fact, and the pursuer is entitled to the expenses of both trials as the successful party.
Court Disposition
Motion for new trial refused; pursuer awarded damages and expenses.
Orders
- Refuse the motion for a rule to show cause why the verdict should not be set aside and a new trial granted.
- Decern against the defenders for payment to the pursuer of the sum of fifty pounds sterling.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment