Creelman & Anor v. Argyll And Bute Council [2009] ScotSC 40 (24 September 2009)
The land owned by the Pursuers, including the track and garden area adjacent to Stronardron and Dunans Lodge, is sufficiently close to the houses that public access would unreasonably interfere with the reasonable privacy and enjoyment of the occupants. The area is relatively small for such properties in a rural location, and the objective test requires exclusion of this land from access rights under Section 6(1)(b)(iv) of the 2003 Act. Accordingly, the notices served by the Council were invalid and are quashed.
- Citation
- [2009] ScotSC 40
- Parties
- Pursuers: Robin Laird Creelman & Moyra Jane Creelman; Defender: Argyll and Bute Council
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 24 September 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Summary Application (sheriff Court) / Judgment After Hearing
- Outcome
- For the Pursuers; declarator granted; notices quashed; hearing on expenses appointed.
- Legal Topics
- Land Reform (scotland) Act 2003, Public Access Rights, Privacy and Enjoyment of Property, Curtilage and Adjacent Land, Summary Application Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Robin Laird Creelman & Moyra Jane Creelman
Pursuers
Argyll and Bute Council
Defender
Procedural Posture
Summary Application (sheriff Court) / Judgment After Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the land owned by the Pursuers is excepted from statutory public access rights under Section 6(1)(b)(iv) of the Land Reform (Scotland) Act 2003 as being sufficient adjacent land to enable reasonable privacy and enjoyment of the houses.
- 2 Whether the notices served by the Council under Section 14 of the Act requiring removal of a sign and barbed wire were valid.
Ratio Decidendi
The land owned by the Pursuers, including the track and garden area adjacent to Stronardron and Dunans Lodge, is sufficiently close to the houses that public access would unreasonably interfere with the reasonable privacy and enjoyment of the occupants. The area is relatively small for such properties in a rural location, and the objective test requires exclusion of this land from access rights under Section 6(1)(b)(iv) of the 2003 Act. Accordingly, the notices served by the Council were invalid and are quashed.
Court Disposition
For the Pursuers; declarator granted; notices quashed; hearing on expenses appointed.
Orders
- Declares that the land owned by the Pursuers is excepted from access rights under Sections 6(1)(b)(iv) and 6(1)(c) of the Land Reform (Scotland) Act 2003.
- Quashes the notices served by Argyll & Bute Council under Section 14 of the Act.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment