Collins & Anor v. Scottish Homes & Anor [2005] ScotCS CSOH_120 (09 September 2005)
The pleadings, though disorganised and lacking in clarity, are not so irrelevant as to justify dismissal at this stage. The pursuers have advanced a relevant case that defects in the gas fire and venting exposed them to carbon monoxide. The question of time-bar cannot be determined without hearing evidence. Certain averments not linked to the core case are excluded from probation.
- Citation
- [2005] ScotCS CSOH_120
- Parties
- Pursuers: Mary Collins and another; First Defenders: Scottish Homes; Second Defenders: Another (Second Defenders)
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 09 September 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Personal Injury / Procedure Roll Discussion on Relevancy and Specification of Pleadings
- Outcome
- Proof before answer allowed; certain averments excluded from probation; expenses reserved.
- Legal Topics
- Landlord Liability, Personal Injury, Carbon Monoxide Poisoning, Time Bar, Statutory Duties, Breach of Contract
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mary Collins and another
Pursuers
Scottish Homes
First Defenders
Another (Second Defenders)
Second Defenders
Procedural Posture
Civil Personal Injury / Procedure Roll Discussion on Relevancy and Specification of Pleadings
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the pursuers' pleadings disclose a relevant and specific case against the defenders for carbon monoxide poisoning
- 2 Whether the claims are time-barred under the Prescription and Limitation (Scotland) Act 1973
- 3 Whether the pleadings adequately distinguish between the responsibilities of each defender
Ratio Decidendi
The pleadings, though disorganised and lacking in clarity, are not so irrelevant as to justify dismissal at this stage. The pursuers have advanced a relevant case that defects in the gas fire and venting exposed them to carbon monoxide. The question of time-bar cannot be determined without hearing evidence. Certain averments not linked to the core case are excluded from probation.
Court Disposition
Proof before answer allowed; certain averments excluded from probation; expenses reserved.
Orders
- Allow proof before answer.
- Exclude specified averments from probation as detailed in the opinion.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment