Ness v. Mills' Trustees [1923] ScotLR 241 (17 January 1923)
The pursuers failed to discharge the onus of showing that the trust purposes had failed due to impossibility of performance, given the wide discretion afforded to the trustees and the possibility of fulfilling the bequest, albeit on a modest scale, with the funds available at the relevant date.
- Citation
- [1923] ScotLR 241
- Parties
- Pursuer: Mrs Johan Mills Balharrie or Livie and David Brown Livie; Defender: Thomas Milne and others, Trustees of John Mills
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 17 January 1923
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Appeal (reclaiming Note) From Interlocutor of Lord Ordinary
- Outcome
- Defenders assoilzied (absolved); action dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Lapse of Bequest, Impossibility of Performance, Accumulation of Income, Trustee Discretion, Resulting Trust
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mrs Johan Mills Balharrie or Livie and David Brown Livie
Pursuer
Thomas Milne and others, Trustees of John Mills
Defender
Procedural Posture
Civil / Appeal (reclaiming Note) From Interlocutor of Lord Ordinary
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the bequest for the erection and maintenance of a scientific institution in Dundee failed due to impossibility of performance from insufficient funds
- 2 Whether the residue and accumulations should fall into intestacy and pass to the heirs in mobilibus
Ratio Decidendi
The pursuers failed to discharge the onus of showing that the trust purposes had failed due to impossibility of performance, given the wide discretion afforded to the trustees and the possibility of fulfilling the bequest, albeit on a modest scale, with the funds available at the relevant date.
Court Disposition
Defenders assoilzied (absolved); action dismissed.
Orders
- Defenders assoilzied from the conclusions of the summons.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment