Wight v. Newton [1911] ScotLR 637 (16 March 1911)

Wight v. Newton [1911] ScotLR 637 (16 March 1911)

A valid contract of lease was constituted by agreement on the essentials and subsequent possession and rei interventus. The disputed clause regarding the landlord's obligation to repair fences, drains, etc., was not proved to have been agreed by writ or oath and must be omitted. The lease is to be executed in terms of the draft, omitting the disputed clauses, and the parties are left to their common law rights regarding repairs.

Citation
[1911] ScotLR 637
Parties
Pursuer: George Wight; Defender: W. D. O. Hay Newton
Jurisdiction
Scotland
Judgment Date
16 March 1911
Procedural Posture
Civil Lease/contract Dispute / Appeal (reclaiming Motion) From Lord Ordinary to Inner House, Second Division
Outcome
Appeal allowed; interlocutor of Lord Ordinary recalled; declarator granted that pursuer is entitled to a lease; defender ordained to execute formal lease with specified omissions; expenses awarded to pursuer.
Legal Topics
Lease Formation, Essential Terms of Lease, Rei Interventus, Proof Scripto, Adjustment of Lease Clauses, Common Law Obligations of Landlord and Tenant
Property Law Contract Law Lease Formation Essential Terms of Lease Rei Interventus Proof Scripto Adjustment of Lease Clauses Common Law Obligations of Landlord and Tenant

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 13 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

George Wight

Pursuer

W. D. O. Hay Newton

Defender

Procedural Posture

Civil Lease/contract Dispute / Appeal (reclaiming Motion) From Lord Ordinary to Inner House, Second Division

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether a valid contract of lease was constituted between the parties despite lack of formal execution and dispute over a specific repair clause.
  2. 2 Whether the disputed clause regarding landlord's obligation to repair fences, drains, etc., formed part of the lease.
  3. 3 Whether the pursuer is entitled to a formal lease and on what terms.

Ratio Decidendi

A valid contract of lease was constituted by agreement on the essentials and subsequent possession and rei interventus. The disputed clause regarding the landlord's obligation to repair fences, drains, etc., was not proved to have been agreed by writ or oath and must be omitted. The lease is to be executed in terms of the draft, omitting the disputed clauses, and the parties are left to their common law rights regarding repairs.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed; interlocutor of Lord Ordinary recalled; declarator granted that pursuer is entitled to a lease; defender ordained to execute formal lease with specified omissions; expenses awarded to pursuer.

Orders

  • Recall the interlocutor reclaimed against.
  • Find and declare pursuer entitled to a lease from defender in terms of draft lease No. 6 of process, with specified omissions of words and clauses relating to dykes, fences, gates, hedges, drains, ditches, water-courses, and others.