EArl of Galloway v. M'Connell [1911] ScotLR 751 (18 May 1911)

EArl of Galloway v. M'Connell [1911] ScotLR 751 (18 May 1911)

The defence that the tenant may retain rent until the landlord fulfills his contractual obligation to put the premises into tenantable repair is relevant where the averments are substantial and not trivial. The right of retention is not limited to instantly verifiable or liquid claims, and the tenant's claim is not merely a set-off for damages but a demand for performance of a reciprocal contractual obligation. The case is governed by the principle that a party in default of their own contractual obligations cannot enforce the contract against the other party.

Citation
[1911] ScotLR 751
Parties
Pursuer: Earl of Galloway; Defender: James M'Connell
Jurisdiction
Scotland
Judgment Date
18 May 1911
Procedural Posture
Landlord and Tenant Dispute / Appeal From Sheriff Court to Court of Session, Inner House, Second Division
Outcome
Appeal allowed; interlocutors of Sheriff and Sheriff-Substitute recalled; case remitted for proof of averments.
Legal Topics
Lease Obligations, Right of Retention, Tenantable Repair, Counterclaim, Proof of Averments
Landlord and Tenant Contract Law Lease Obligations Right of Retention Tenantable Repair Counterclaim Proof of Averments

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 13 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Earl of Galloway

Pursuer

James M'Connell

Defender

Procedural Posture

Landlord and Tenant Dispute / Appeal From Sheriff Court to Court of Session, Inner House, Second Division

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether a tenant may retain rent due under a lease until the landlord fulfills obligations to put buildings, fences, and gates into tenantable repair as contracted.
  2. 2 Whether the tenant's defence based on landlord's alleged breach is relevant and entitles him to proof.

Ratio Decidendi

The defence that the tenant may retain rent until the landlord fulfills his contractual obligation to put the premises into tenantable repair is relevant where the averments are substantial and not trivial. The right of retention is not limited to instantly verifiable or liquid claims, and the tenant's claim is not merely a set-off for damages but a demand for performance of a reciprocal contractual obligation. The case is governed by the principle that a party in default of their own contractual obligations cannot enforce the contract against the other party.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed; interlocutors of Sheriff and Sheriff-Substitute recalled; case remitted for proof of averments.

Orders

  • Recall interlocutors appealed against.
  • Remit to Sheriff-Substitute to allow proof of averments.