Crieff Highland Gathering Ltd v Perth & Kinross Council [2010] ScotCS CSOH_67 (25 May 2010)
The pursuers have averred sufficient circumstances—material breach, notice, and failure to remedy—to entitle them to a proof on the issue of rescission. The maintenance obligations are central to the lease, and breach thereof may be material. The content of Clause (TENTH) is sufficiently clear to be enforceable, and the issues of materiality and reasonableness require evidence and cannot be dismissed at this stage.
- Citation
- [2010] ScotCS CSOH_67
- Parties
- Pursuer: Crieff Highland Gathering Limited; Defender: Perth and Kinross Council
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 25 May 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Lease Dispute / Procedure Roll Hearing on Defender's Plea for Dismissal
- Outcome
- Defender's motion for dismissal refused; proof before answer allowed with all pleas standing.
- Legal Topics
- Lease Termination, Material Breach, Maintenance Obligations, Rescission of Contract, Listed Buildings
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Crieff Highland Gathering Limited
Pursuer
Perth and Kinross Council
Defender
Procedural Posture
Civil Lease Dispute / Procedure Roll Hearing on Defender's Plea for Dismissal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defender breached a material condition of the lease justifying rescission
- 2 Whether the notice of dilapidations and termination was adequate
- 3 Whether the maintenance obligations under Clause (TENTH) are enforceable and material
Ratio Decidendi
The pursuers have averred sufficient circumstances—material breach, notice, and failure to remedy—to entitle them to a proof on the issue of rescission. The maintenance obligations are central to the lease, and breach thereof may be material. The content of Clause (TENTH) is sufficiently clear to be enforceable, and the issues of materiality and reasonableness require evidence and cannot be dismissed at this stage.
Court Disposition
Defender's motion for dismissal refused; proof before answer allowed with all pleas standing.
Orders
- Repel first plea in law for each party (not argued).
- Allow proof before answer with all pleas standing.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment