Coats' Trustees v. Coats [1914] ScotLR 690 (02 June 1914)
Where only one child claims legitim, the doctrine of collation does not apply; the legitim fund is one-half of the moveable estate at death, and the claimant is entitled to a pro rata share without addition for advances to herself or other children.
- Citation
- [1914] ScotLR 690
- Parties
- First Parties: William Hodge Coats, John Alexander Spens, and Ernest Symington Coats (Trustees of Archibald Coats); Second Party: Miss Evelyn Dudley Coats; Third Parties: William Hodge Coats and others (children or representatives of Archibald Coats other than Miss Evelyn Coats); Fourth and Fifth Parties: Children of two married daughters of Archibald Coats
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 02 June 1914
- Procedural Posture
- Special Case (court of Session, Inner House, First Division) / Judgment on Legal Questions Regarding Calculation of Legitim
- Outcome
- Judgment for the first, third, fourth, and fifth parties; claim of second party limited to one-fifth of one-half of the moveable estate at death.
- Legal Topics
- Legitim, Collatio Bonorum Inter Liberos, Advances to Children, Calculation of Legitim Fund
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
William Hodge Coats, John Alexander Spens, and Ernest Symington Coats (Trustees of Archibald Coats)
First Parties
Miss Evelyn Dudley Coats
Second Party
William Hodge Coats and others (children or representatives of Archibald Coats other than Miss Evelyn Coats)
Third Parties
Children of two married daughters of Archibald Coats
Fourth and Fifth Parties
Procedural Posture
Special Case (court of Session, Inner House, First Division) / Judgment on Legal Questions Regarding Calculation of Legitim
Legal Issues
- 1 How should the legitim fund be calculated when only one child claims legitim and others accept testamentary provisions?
- 2 Does the doctrine of collatio bonorum inter liberos require advances to all children to be included in the legitim fund calculation when only one child claims?
Ratio Decidendi
Where only one child claims legitim, the doctrine of collation does not apply; the legitim fund is one-half of the moveable estate at death, and the claimant is entitled to a pro rata share without addition for advances to herself or other children.
Court Disposition
Judgment for the first, third, fourth, and fifth parties; claim of second party limited to one-fifth of one-half of the moveable estate at death.
Orders
- The legitim fund is one-half of the moveable estate at death; advances to children are not to be added unless more than one child claims.
- Second party entitled to one-fifth of one-half of the moveable estate, with no deduction or addition for advances.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment