Ross Harper & Murphy & Ors v Banks [2000] ScotCS 120 (11 May 2000)
A partner may be liable to the firm and co-partners for loss caused by his failure to exercise reasonable care in the conduct of partnership business, and such liability is not excluded by the settlement agreement unless expressly or clearly provided. The exclusion and indemnity clauses in the agreement do not exclude the present claim for negligence or breach of duty owed to the firm.
- Citation
- [2000] ScotCS 120
- Parties
- Pursuers: Ross Harper & Murphy and Others; Defender: Scott Banks
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 11 May 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Action (damages Claim Between Former Partners) / Interlocutory Opinion on Relevancy and Effect of Settlement Agreement
- Outcome
- Pursuers' fifth plea-in-law sustained to the extent of repelling the defender's two pleas (pleas 2 and 3) based on the Agreement. Case put out By Order for further procedure.
- Legal Topics
- Liability of Partners to Each Other, Implied Terms in Partnership Agreements, Exclusion Clauses, Standard of Care Among Partners, Interpretation of Settlement Agreements
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ross Harper & Murphy and Others
Pursuers
Scott Banks
Defender
Procedural Posture
Commercial Action (damages Claim Between Former Partners) / Interlocutory Opinion on Relevancy and Effect of Settlement Agreement
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a partner may be liable in damages to the firm and co-partners for loss sustained by reason of liability incurred to a third party due to his act or omission
- 2 What is the standard of care owed by a partner to the firm and co-partners
- 3 Whether the settlement agreement between the parties excludes or discharges such liability
Ratio Decidendi
A partner may be liable to the firm and co-partners for loss caused by his failure to exercise reasonable care in the conduct of partnership business, and such liability is not excluded by the settlement agreement unless expressly or clearly provided. The exclusion and indemnity clauses in the agreement do not exclude the present claim for negligence or breach of duty owed to the firm.
Court Disposition
Pursuers' fifth plea-in-law sustained to the extent of repelling the defender's two pleas (pleas 2 and 3) based on the Agreement. Case put out By Order for further procedure.
Orders
- Defender's pleas 2 and 3 repelled insofar as they rely on the Agreement
- Case to be put out By Order to consider further procedure in light of the court's views on the first principal issue
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment