Harrison v West Of Scotland Kart Club & Ors [2000] ScotCS 284 (14 November 2000)
The law of Scotland, in line with English authority, does not permit a member of an unincorporated association to sue the association or its office bearers in delict for acts done in their capacity as members or office bearers, as this would be equivalent to suing oneself. No vicarious liability arises absent special circumstances or contractual provisions. Personal liability may arise only if a specific duty is undertaken and breached with actual knowledge of danger. The pursuer's pleadings against the club and office bearers are irrelevant and must be dismissed.
- Citation
- [2000] ScotCS 284
- Parties
- Pursuer: Kenneth Harrison; First Defender: West of Scotland Kart Club; First Defender (office Bearer): Alfred Murie; First Defender (office Bearer): Chris Baillie; First Defender (office Bearer): Bill McDonald; First Defender (office Bearer): Roseabel Carter; First Defender (office Bearer): Ina Nelson; Second Defender: Royal Automobile Club Motor Sport Association Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 14 November 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Personal Injury/delict (civil) / Debate on Relevancy (pre Proof)
- Outcome
- Action against the first defenders (club and office bearers) dismissed as irrelevant; no proof allowed against them.
- Legal Topics
- Liability of Unincorporated Associations, Duty of Care Between Club Members, Occupiers Liability (scotland) Act 1960, Vicarious Liability, Personal Liability of Office Bearers
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kenneth Harrison
Pursuer
West of Scotland Kart Club
First Defender
Alfred Murie
First Defender (office Bearer)
Chris Baillie
First Defender (office Bearer)
Bill McDonald
First Defender (office Bearer)
Roseabel Carter
First Defender (office Bearer)
Ina Nelson
First Defender (office Bearer)
Royal Automobile Club Motor Sport Association Limited
Second Defender
Procedural Posture
Personal Injury/delict (civil) / Debate on Relevancy (pre Proof)
Legal Issues
- 1 Can a member of an unincorporated club sue the club or its office bearers for personal injury allegedly caused by negligence?
- 2 Does the law of Scotland recognise personal or vicarious liability of club office bearers to members?
- 3 Are there exceptions to the general rule that a member cannot sue the club?
Ratio Decidendi
The law of Scotland, in line with English authority, does not permit a member of an unincorporated association to sue the association or its office bearers in delict for acts done in their capacity as members or office bearers, as this would be equivalent to suing oneself. No vicarious liability arises absent special circumstances or contractual provisions. Personal liability may arise only if a specific duty is undertaken and breached with actual knowledge of danger. The pursuer's pleadings against the club and office bearers are irrelevant and must be dismissed.
Court Disposition
Action against the first defenders (club and office bearers) dismissed as irrelevant; no proof allowed against them.
Orders
- Dismissal of action against West of Scotland Kart Club and named office bearers.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment