Black and Others v. Magistrates of Grangemouth [1906] ScotLR 44_185 (15 December 1906)
The magistrates' resolution was not ultra vires as Ward I was a legitimate 'particular locality' under the Act, despite containing all public-houses in the burgh, and the certificates, though imperfect in form, were not invalid. The omission of the closing hour in the register did not vitiate the certificates. The appeal to the Licensing Appeal Court was incompetent.
- Citation
- [1906] ScotLR 44_185
- Parties
- Pursuers and Reclaimers: David Black and Others; Defenders and Respondents: Provost and Magistrates of Grangemouth and Others
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 15 December 1906
- Procedural Posture
- Civil (reduction of Administrative Act) / Appeal (reclaiming Motion) From Lord Ordinary's Interlocutor
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; interlocutor of Lord Ordinary adhered to; defenders assoilzied from all conclusions of the action.
- Legal Topics
- Licensing (scotland) Act 1903, Ultra Vires, Public House Closing Hours, Certificate Validity, Register of Applications, Competency of Appeal
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
David Black and Others
Pursuers and Reclaimers
Provost and Magistrates of Grangemouth and Others
Defenders and Respondents
Procedural Posture
Civil (reduction of Administrative Act) / Appeal (reclaiming Motion) From Lord Ordinary's Interlocutor
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the magistrates' resolution defining Ward I as a 'particular locality' and imposing a 9 p.m. closing hour was ultra vires under the Licensing (Scotland) Act 1903, section 35.
- 2 Whether certificates issued with a footnote (rather than in gremio) specifying the closing hour are invalid or disconform to the register.
- 3 Whether the omission of the closing hour in the register invalidates the certificates.
Ratio Decidendi
The magistrates' resolution was not ultra vires as Ward I was a legitimate 'particular locality' under the Act, despite containing all public-houses in the burgh, and the certificates, though imperfect in form, were not invalid. The omission of the closing hour in the register did not vitiate the certificates. The appeal to the Licensing Appeal Court was incompetent.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; interlocutor of Lord Ordinary adhered to; defenders assoilzied from all conclusions of the action.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment