Anderson & Ors v International Oil Pollution Compensation Fund & Ors [2001] ScotCS 55 (8 March 2001)
Objectors were entitled to expenses as claims failed, and separate representation justified separate awards despite overlap; expenses abated by 15% due to unnecessary prolongation by certain evidence; legal aid modification for Miss Fowlie granted to nil based on means; expert witness certification granted with limitations based on scope of expertise.
- Citation
- [2001] ScotCS 55
- Parties
- Claimant: Christopher Andrew Anderson; Claimant: John Desmond Black; Claimant: Geoffrey Brown; Claimant: Doreen Brown; Claimant: Sheila Fowlie; Claimant: Gordon Johnston; Claimant: Linda Jane Johnston; Claimant: John Robert McLachlan; Pursuer: Assuranceforeningen Skuld; Defender/objector: The International Oil Pollution Compensation Fund; Defender: The Braer Corporation; Objector: James L R Robb; Objector: Brian Robb; Objector: Huxter Salmon Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 08 March 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Civil (limitation and Payment Actions) / Post Proof Motions and Expenses Determination
- Outcome
- Claims dismissed; expenses awarded to objectors and defenders with abatement; modification of expenses for legally aided party; certification of expert witnesses with limitations.
- Legal Topics
- Limitation of Liability, Oil Pollution Compensation, Expenses (costs), Expert Witness Certification, Legal Aid Modification
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Christopher Andrew Anderson
Claimant
John Desmond Black
Claimant
Geoffrey Brown
Claimant
Doreen Brown
Claimant
Sheila Fowlie
Claimant
Gordon Johnston
Claimant
Linda Jane Johnston
Claimant
John Robert McLachlan
Claimant
Assuranceforeningen Skuld
Pursuer
The International Oil Pollution Compensation Fund
Defender/objector
The Braer Corporation
Defender
James L R Robb
Objector
Brian Robb
Objector
Huxter Salmon Limited
Objector
Procedural Posture
Civil (limitation and Payment Actions) / Post Proof Motions and Expenses Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether expenses should be awarded to objectors following failure of claims
- 2 Whether separate representation justifies separate awards of expenses
- 3 Modification of expenses liability for legally aided party
Ratio Decidendi
Objectors were entitled to expenses as claims failed, and separate representation justified separate awards despite overlap; expenses abated by 15% due to unnecessary prolongation by certain evidence; legal aid modification for Miss Fowlie granted to nil based on means; expert witness certification granted with limitations based on scope of expertise.
Court Disposition
Claims dismissed; expenses awarded to objectors and defenders with abatement; modification of expenses for legally aided party; certification of expert witnesses with limitations.
Orders
- Interlocutor of 14 February 2001 altered to correct slip regarding liability wording.
- Miss Fowlie awarded expenses against Huxter Salmon Limited for specific motion.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment