John Moodie & Co & Ors v. Coastal Marine (Boatbuilders) Ltd [2002] ScotCS 263 (19 September 2002)

John Moodie & Co & Ors v. Coastal Marine (Boatbuilders) Ltd [2002] ScotCS 263 (19 September 2002)

Clause 12.7 operates as a general limitation of liability for consequential losses arising from breakdown or machinery failure, irrespective of the ground on which the claim is made, and is not restricted to claims under the guarantee provisions. Accordingly, claims for such losses are excluded from probation where they fall within the scope of the clause.

Citation
[2002] ScotCS 263
Parties
Pursuers: John Moodie & Co and Others; Defenders: Coastal Marine (Boatbuilders) Ltd
Jurisdiction
Scotland
Judgment Date
19 September 2002
Procedural Posture
Commercial Contract Dispute / Interlocutory Judgment on Relevancy and Construction of Limitation Clause
Outcome
Partial dismissal and exclusion of averments; proof before answer allowed on remaining issues.
Legal Topics
Limitation of Liability, Construction of Contract Terms, Supply of Goods and Services Act 1982, Consequential Loss Exclusion, Implied Terms

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 10
Sign in to unlock

Parties

John Moodie & Co and Others

Pursuers

Coastal Marine (Boatbuilders) Ltd

Defenders

Procedural Posture

Commercial Contract Dispute / Interlocutory Judgment on Relevancy and Construction of Limitation Clause

  1. 1 Whether Clause 12.7 of the contract excludes liability for consequential losses irrespective of the basis of claim
  2. 2 Whether Clause 12.7 applies only to claims under the guarantee provisions or more broadly
  3. 3 Whether certain averments of loss are relevant in light of Clause 12.7

Ratio Decidendi

Clause 12.7 operates as a general limitation of liability for consequential losses arising from breakdown or machinery failure, irrespective of the ground on which the claim is made, and is not restricted to claims under the guarantee provisions. Accordingly, claims for such losses are excluded from probation where they fall within the scope of the clause.

Court Disposition

Partial dismissal and exclusion of averments; proof before answer allowed on remaining issues.

Orders

  • Exclude from probation the whole averments in articles 4 and 8 of the condescendence.
  • Exclude specified averments in article 9 and answer 7 as detailed in the judgment.