MacKinnon In The Cause Hurst Fuels Ltd v Dundonald House Ltd [1999] ScotCS 68 (5 March 1999)

MacKinnon In The Cause Hurst Fuels Ltd v Dundonald House Ltd [1999] ScotCS 68 (5 March 1999)

The Sheriff was entitled, in the exercise of his discretion, to order the Noter to find caution for expenses based on multiple relevant factors including the Noter's impecuniosity, prior litigation conduct, lack of support from other creditors, and the small value of his claim. The Sheriff Principal and Court of Session found no procedural unfairness or error in the exercise of discretion, and the appeal was dismissed.

Citation
[1999] ScotCS 68
Parties
Appellant and Noter: Robert Johnstone MacKinnon; Pursuers: Hurst Fuels Limited; Defender: Dundonald House Limited
Jurisdiction
Scotland
Judgment Date
05 March 1999
Procedural Posture
Appeal From Sheriff Court (summary Application Under Insolvency Act 1986, S.212) / Appeal to Court of Session From Interlocutors Ordering Caution and Dismissing Note
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Liquidator's Duties, Caution for Expenses, Personal Bar, Summary Application, Judicial Discretion
Insolvency Civil Procedure Liquidator's Duties Caution for Expenses Personal Bar Summary Application Judicial Discretion

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Robert Johnstone MacKinnon

Appellant and Noter

Hurst Fuels Limited

Pursuers

Dundonald House Limited

Defender

Procedural Posture

Appeal From Sheriff Court (summary Application Under Insolvency Act 1986, S.212) / Appeal to Court of Session From Interlocutors Ordering Caution and Dismissing Note

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Sheriff erred in ordering the Noter to find caution for expenses
  2. 2 Whether the Noter was personally barred from proceeding by a prior discharge agreement
  3. 3 Whether procedural irregularities prejudiced the Noter

Ratio Decidendi

The Sheriff was entitled, in the exercise of his discretion, to order the Noter to find caution for expenses based on multiple relevant factors including the Noter's impecuniosity, prior litigation conduct, lack of support from other creditors, and the small value of his claim. The Sheriff Principal and Court of Session found no procedural unfairness or error in the exercise of discretion, and the appeal was dismissed.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Interlocutors of Sheriff and Sheriff Principal affirmed
  • Noter found liable in expenses as taxed