Hyndman v. Readman [2004] ScotCS 156 (25 June 2004)

Hyndman v. Readman [2004] ScotCS 156 (25 June 2004)

Section 53(4) of the Bankruptcy (Scotland) Act 1985 does not create a presumption or requirement for a commission basis in fixing a liquidator's remuneration; the sheriff was entitled to determine remuneration based on the work performed and responsibilities undertaken, as assessed by the reporter, and there was no error in relying on the report or in the process followed.

Citation
[2004] ScotCS 156
Parties
Objector and Appellant: Carole Hyndman; Liquidator and Respondent: J. C. Readman
Jurisdiction
Scotland
Judgment Date
25 June 2004
Procedural Posture
Appeal From Sheriff Court (liquidation Proceedings) / Appeal Judgment
Outcome
Appeal refused
Legal Topics
Liquidator's Remuneration, Interpretation of Bankruptcy (scotland) Act 1985 S.53(4), Basis for Fixing Liquidator's Fees, Judicial Review of Liquidator's Account

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Carole Hyndman

Objector and Appellant

J. C. Readman

Liquidator and Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal From Sheriff Court (liquidation Proceedings) / Appeal Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the sheriff erred in determining the liquidator's remuneration without adopting a commission basis as allegedly required by s.53(4) of the Bankruptcy (Scotland) Act 1985
  2. 2 Whether the sheriff erred in relying on the reporter's report regarding the reasonableness of the liquidator's fees
  3. 3 Whether the sheriff failed to properly consider the responsibilities and work undertaken by the liquidator as required by statute

Ratio Decidendi

Section 53(4) of the Bankruptcy (Scotland) Act 1985 does not create a presumption or requirement for a commission basis in fixing a liquidator's remuneration; the sheriff was entitled to determine remuneration based on the work performed and responsibilities undertaken, as assessed by the reporter, and there was no error in relying on the report or in the process followed.

Court Disposition

Appeal refused

Orders

  • The appeal is refused.