Taylor v City Of Glasgow Council [1999] ScotCS 185 (3 August 1999)

Taylor v City Of Glasgow Council [1999] ScotCS 185 (3 August 1999)

The pursuer's pleadings failed to specify any particular difficulty, awkwardness, or characteristic of the manual handling operation that involved a risk of injury; mere assertion of injury during manual handling is insufficient. Without adequate specification of risk, the action cannot proceed.

Citation
[1999] ScotCS 185
Parties
Pursuer: David Taylor; Defender: City of Glasgow Council
Jurisdiction
Scotland
Judgment Date
03 August 1999
Procedural Posture
Civil (personal Injury/statutory Duty) / Procedure Roll (plea in Law for Dismissal)
Outcome
Action dismissed
Legal Topics
Manual Handling Operations, Employer's Statutory Duty, Risk of Injury, Specification of Pleadings
Employment Law Health and Safety Law Manual Handling Operations Employer's Statutory Duty Risk of Injury Specification of Pleadings

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

David Taylor

Pursuer

City of Glasgow Council

Defender

Procedural Posture

Civil (personal Injury/statutory Duty) / Procedure Roll (plea in Law for Dismissal)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the pursuer's pleadings specify sufficient facts to establish a risk of injury under the Manual Handling Operations Regulations 1992
  2. 2 Whether a mere assertion of injury during manual handling suffices to establish liability under the Regulations

Ratio Decidendi

The pursuer's pleadings failed to specify any particular difficulty, awkwardness, or characteristic of the manual handling operation that involved a risk of injury; mere assertion of injury during manual handling is insufficient. Without adequate specification of risk, the action cannot proceed.

Court Disposition

Action dismissed

Orders

  • Action dismissed due to want of specification; no proof allowed.