Boyd v Lanarkshire Health Board [2000] ScotCS 48 (25 February 2000)
The pursuer failed to establish on a balance of probabilities the circumstances of his accident and how his injury was sustained; therefore, liability could not be imposed on the defenders under the Manual Handling Operations Regulations 1992.
- Citation
- [2000] ScotCS 48
- Parties
- Pursuer: Robert Boyd; Defenders: Lanarkshire Health Board
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 25 February 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Personal Injury/employer's Liability / Judgment After Proof (trial)
- Outcome
- Defenders assoilzied (absolved); pursuer's case dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Manual Handling Operations Regulations 1992, Employer's Duty of Care, Workplace Injury, Burden of Proof, Causation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Robert Boyd
Pursuer
Lanarkshire Health Board
Defenders
Procedural Posture
Personal Injury/employer's Liability / Judgment After Proof (trial)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defenders breached the Manual Handling Operations Regulations 1992
- 2 Whether any breach caused the pursuer's injury
- 3 Whether the pursuer established the circumstances of his accident on the balance of probabilities
Ratio Decidendi
The pursuer failed to establish on a balance of probabilities the circumstances of his accident and how his injury was sustained; therefore, liability could not be imposed on the defenders under the Manual Handling Operations Regulations 1992.
Court Disposition
Defenders assoilzied (absolved); pursuer's case dismissed.
Orders
- Sustain defenders' second and third pleas-in-law.
- Assoilzie (absolve) the defenders.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment