H.S. AGAINST F.S. [2015] ScotCS CSIH_14 (18 February 2015)
The Lord Ordinary was entitled to conclude, based on an objective assessment of all circumstances, that the parties continued to cohabit until 19 June 2013, when the pursuer's intention to divorce was communicated to the defender. No error of law or fact was established that would justify appellate intervention.
- Citation
- [2015] ScotCS CSIH_14
- Parties
- Pursuer and Reclaimer: HS; Defender and Respondent: FS
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 18 February 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Reclaiming Motion (appeal) in Matrimonial Proceedings / Inner House, Court of Session, Post Preliminary Proof
- Outcome
- Reclaiming motion refused; Lord Ordinary's determination affirmed.
- Legal Topics
- Matrimonial Property, Relevant Date Determination, Cohabitation, Appeals on Findings of Fact
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
HS
Pursuer and Reclaimer
FS
Defender and Respondent
Procedural Posture
Reclaiming Motion (appeal) in Matrimonial Proceedings / Inner House, Court of Session, Post Preliminary Proof
Legal Issues
- 1 What is the correct 'relevant date' for fixing and valuing matrimonial property under s.10(3) Family Law (Scotland) Act 1985?
- 2 Did the Lord Ordinary err in law or fact in determining the relevant date as 19 June 2013?
Ratio Decidendi
The Lord Ordinary was entitled to conclude, based on an objective assessment of all circumstances, that the parties continued to cohabit until 19 June 2013, when the pursuer's intention to divorce was communicated to the defender. No error of law or fact was established that would justify appellate intervention.
Court Disposition
Reclaiming motion refused; Lord Ordinary's determination affirmed.
Orders
- Relevant date for matrimonial property fixed at 19 June 2013.
- No change to first instance orders.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment