INQUIRY UNDER THE FATAL ACCIDENTS (SCOTLAND) ACT 1976 INTO THE SUDDEN DEATH OF RONALD WILLIAM MCALLISTER [2013] ScotSC 22 (28 March 2013)
The death of Ronald William McAllister was caused by blood loss from the dislodgement of a dialysis cannula during haemodialysis, compounded by insufficient monitoring and suboptimal alarm settings on the dialysis machine. Reasonable precautions, including a second check of needle security, optimal alarm settings, and more frequent monitoring, could have reduced the risk. Staff training and documentation procedures were found to be inadequate at the time.
- Citation
- [2013] ScotSC 22
- Parties
- Deceased: Ronald William McAllister; Procurator Fiscal Depute (public Interest): Mr Graham; Representative for the Daughters of the Deceased: Mr Henderson; Representative for Greater Glasgow Health Board: Mr Stewart
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 28 March 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Fatal Accident Inquiry / Determination After Evidentiary Hearing
- Outcome
- Findings and recommendations issued; no civil or criminal liability determined.
- Legal Topics
- Medical Negligence, Hospital Procedures, Haemodialysis Safety, Training of Medical Staff, Medical Device Alarms, Patient Monitoring, Delay in Legal Proceedings
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ronald William McAllister
Deceased
Mr Graham
Procurator Fiscal Depute (public Interest)
Mr Henderson
Representative for the Daughters of the Deceased
Mr Stewart
Representative for Greater Glasgow Health Board
Procedural Posture
Fatal Accident Inquiry / Determination After Evidentiary Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 What were the circumstances and causes of the death of Ronald William McAllister?
- 2 What reasonable precautions could have prevented the death?
- 3 Were there any defects in the system of working which contributed to the death?
Ratio Decidendi
The death of Ronald William McAllister was caused by blood loss from the dislodgement of a dialysis cannula during haemodialysis, compounded by insufficient monitoring and suboptimal alarm settings on the dialysis machine. Reasonable precautions, including a second check of needle security, optimal alarm settings, and more frequent monitoring, could have reduced the risk. Staff training and documentation procedures were found to be inadequate at the time.
Court Disposition
Findings and recommendations issued; no civil or criminal liability determined.
Orders
- Greater Glasgow Health Board to review staff training in haemodialysis delivery.
- GGHB to review procedures for documenting and recording patient checks during haemodialysis.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment