INQUIRY UNDER THE FATAL ACCIDENTS AND INQUIRIES (SCOTLAND) ACT 1976 INTO THE SUDDEN DEATH OF JOHN WILLOCK [2013] ScotSC 79 (08 October 2013)
The court found that there were failures by NHS 24 call handlers and nurse advisors to follow established protocols for return callers, to accurately record and communicate relevant clinical information, and to arrange for a face-to-face medical assessment when indicated by the patient's deteriorating condition. These failures constituted defects in the system of work and missed reasonable precautions that might have avoided the death. However, the court could not determine on the balance of probabilities that earlier intervention would have definitively prevented Mr Willock's death, given the uncertainty of the underlying medical cause and the rapid progression of his illness.
- Citation
- [2013] ScotSC 79
- Parties
- Crown (procurator Fiscal): Ms Elizabeth Ross; Partner of Deceased/interested Party: Ms Carolann Rogers; General Practitioner (witness): Dr Murray MacPherson; General Practitioner (witness): Dr Tracey Hanley; General Practitioner (witness): Dr Patrick Branchfield; Nurse Advisor (witness): Nurse Fiona McCulloch; Nurse Advisor (witness): Nurse Pamela Scally; Interested Party: Greater Glasgow and Clyde Health Board Out of Hours Service; Interested Party: NHS 24
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 08 October 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Fatal Accident Inquiry / Determination
- Outcome
- Death due to septicaemia, source uncertain; defects in NHS 24 and Out of Hours Service systems contributed to missed opportunities for intervention; recommendations for improved protocols and training.
- Legal Topics
- Medical Negligence, Out of Hours Healthcare, NHS 24 Procedures, Clinical Governance, Sudden Death Investigation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ms Elizabeth Ross
Crown (procurator Fiscal)
Ms Carolann Rogers
Partner of Deceased/interested Party
Dr Murray MacPherson
General Practitioner (witness)
Dr Tracey Hanley
General Practitioner (witness)
Dr Patrick Branchfield
General Practitioner (witness)
Nurse Fiona McCulloch
Nurse Advisor (witness)
Nurse Pamela Scally
Nurse Advisor (witness)
Greater Glasgow and Clyde Health Board Out of Hours Service
Interested Party
NHS 24
Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Fatal Accident Inquiry / Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether reasonable precautions could have prevented the death of John Willock
- 2 Whether defects in the NHS 24 and Out of Hours Service systems contributed to the death
- 3 Whether the actions of individual healthcare professionals met the required standard of care
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that there were failures by NHS 24 call handlers and nurse advisors to follow established protocols for return callers, to accurately record and communicate relevant clinical information, and to arrange for a face-to-face medical assessment when indicated by the patient's deteriorating condition. These failures constituted defects in the system of work and missed reasonable precautions that might have avoided the death. However, the court could not determine on the balance of probabilities that earlier intervention would have definitively prevented Mr Willock's death, given the uncertainty of the underlying medical cause and the rapid progression of his illness.
Court Disposition
Death due to septicaemia, source uncertain; defects in NHS 24 and Out of Hours Service systems contributed to missed opportunities for intervention; recommendations for improved protocols and training.
Orders
- Determination issued under s.6 of the 1976 Act setting out circumstances of death, cause, and defects in system.
- Recommendations for NHS 24 and Out of Hours Service to review and improve protocols for return callers, handover procedures, and clinical triage.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment