MORTGAGES 1 LTD v. SHAIDA AHMED CHAUDHARY [2013] ScotSC 109 (14 November 2013)
The sheriff erred by granting decree by default without addressing the statutory requirements to consider the reasonableness of granting the application and the ability of the debtor and residents to secure alternative accommodation. The sheriff failed to reference or address the defender's answers and circumstances as required by law.
- Citation
- [2013] ScotSC 109
- Parties
- Pursuers and Respondents: Mortgages 1 Limited; Defender and Appellant: Shaida Ahmed Chaudhary
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 14 November 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal (civil) / Appeal Against Decree by Default in Summary Application for Possession and Removal
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; sheriff's interlocutor of 6 June 2013 recalled; cause remitted to By Order Roll for further proceedings; defender and appellant found liable in expenses of the appeal.
- Legal Topics
- Mortgage Repossession, Summary Application, Default Decree, Reasonableness Test, Alternative Accommodation, Legal Aid
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mortgages 1 Limited
Pursuers and Respondents
Shaida Ahmed Chaudhary
Defender and Appellant
Procedural Posture
Appeal (civil) / Appeal Against Decree by Default in Summary Application for Possession and Removal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sheriff erred in granting decree by default without considering statutory requirements under section 24 of the Conveyancing and Feudal Reform (Scotland) Act 1970
- 2 Whether the sheriff failed to consider the defender's circumstances and submissions regarding alternative accommodation and hardship
Ratio Decidendi
The sheriff erred by granting decree by default without addressing the statutory requirements to consider the reasonableness of granting the application and the ability of the debtor and residents to secure alternative accommodation. The sheriff failed to reference or address the defender's answers and circumstances as required by law.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; sheriff's interlocutor of 6 June 2013 recalled; cause remitted to By Order Roll for further proceedings; defender and appellant found liable in expenses of the appeal.
Orders
- Recall of sheriff's interlocutor dated 6 June 2013.
- Remit cause to sheriff's By Order Roll for further proceedings.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment