Paterson v. The Scottish Insurance Commissioners [1917] ScotLR 293 (16 February 1917)
Section 69(2) of the National Insurance Act 1911 authorises the Sheriff-Substitute, upon conviction for failure to pay contributions, to order payment of the unpaid contributions in the criminal proceedings without a separate civil process. The procedure followed was regular and in accordance with the statute. However, the execution of diligence was irregular due to a fatal defect in the charge, rendering the subsequent poinding and sale invalid and entitling the pursuer to limited damages.
- Citation
- [1917] ScotLR 293
- Parties
- Pursuer and Reclaimer: Robert Paterson; Defenders and Respondents: The Scottish Insurance Commissioners
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 16 February 1917
- Procedural Posture
- Civil (reduction and Damages) / Appeal (reclaiming Motion) From Lord Ordinary to Inner House, Second Division
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; interlocutor of Lord Ordinary adhered to.
- Legal Topics
- National Insurance Contributions, Employer Liability, Summary Procedure, Reduction of Diligence, Damages for Irregular Diligence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Robert Paterson
Pursuer and Reclaimer
The Scottish Insurance Commissioners
Defenders and Respondents
Procedural Posture
Civil (reduction and Damages) / Appeal (reclaiming Motion) From Lord Ordinary to Inner House, Second Division
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether, under the National Insurance Act 1911, s.69(2), a Sheriff-Substitute could order payment of unpaid contributions in criminal proceedings without a separate civil process.
- 2 Whether the diligence (charge, poinding, sale) following the order was regular and lawful.
- 3 Whether the pursuer was entitled to damages for irregular diligence.
Ratio Decidendi
Section 69(2) of the National Insurance Act 1911 authorises the Sheriff-Substitute, upon conviction for failure to pay contributions, to order payment of the unpaid contributions in the criminal proceedings without a separate civil process. The procedure followed was regular and in accordance with the statute. However, the execution of diligence was irregular due to a fatal defect in the charge, rendering the subsequent poinding and sale invalid and entitling the pursuer to limited damages.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; interlocutor of Lord Ordinary adhered to.
Orders
- Reduction refused as to minute and extract order for payment of contributions.
- Reduction granted as to execution of charge, poinding, and warrants of sale.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment