Mars v. Glasgow Corporation [1940] ScotCS CSIH_1 (02 February 1940)
Glasgow Corporation was liable because, having admitted the sudden stop and resulting injuries, they failed to prove that the accident was caused by a third party. The onus was on the Corporation to establish the alternative explanation, which they did not discharge.
- Citation
- [1940] ScotCS CSIH_1
- Parties
- Pursuer: Mrs Mars; Pursuer: Mr Mars (as tutor for Margaret Mars); Defender: Glasgow Corporation; Defender: Miss M'Ginnis
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 02 February 1940
- Procedural Posture
- Delict (personal Injury) / Appeal From Sheriff Substitute
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part; judgment against Glasgow Corporation; claim against Miss M'Ginnis dismissed (not proven)
- Legal Topics
- Negligence, Onus of Proof, Res Ipsa Loquitur, Liability of Public Transport Operators
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mrs Mars
Pursuer
Mr Mars (as tutor for Margaret Mars)
Pursuer
Glasgow Corporation
Defender
Miss M'Ginnis
Defender
Procedural Posture
Delict (personal Injury) / Appeal From Sheriff Substitute
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Glasgow Corporation was liable for injuries caused by sudden braking of tramway car
- 2 Whether liability could be transferred to a third-party motorist (Miss M'Ginnis)
- 3 Proper allocation of onus of proof in cases involving alternative explanations for injury
Ratio Decidendi
Glasgow Corporation was liable because, having admitted the sudden stop and resulting injuries, they failed to prove that the accident was caused by a third party. The onus was on the Corporation to establish the alternative explanation, which they did not discharge.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part; judgment against Glasgow Corporation; claim against Miss M'Ginnis dismissed (not proven)
Orders
- Glasgow Corporation held liable for injuries to Mrs Mars and Margaret Mars
- Claim against Miss M'Ginnis dismissed as not proven
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment