McDonald (AP) v Chambers [2000] ScotCS 1 (5 January 2000)
The defender was primarily at fault for failing to observe the changing traffic signals and take action to avoid the pursuer, but the pursuer was also at fault for stepping onto the crossing without ensuring it was safe. Liability apportioned two-thirds to the defender and one-third to the pursuer.
- Citation
- [2000] ScotCS 1
- Parties
- Pursuer: Alison McDonald (AP); Defender: Sarah Weir Chambers
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 05 January 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Personal Injury Action / Judgment After Proof (trial)
- Outcome
- Defender found liable for two-thirds of the pursuer's damages; pursuer found one-third contributorily negligent.
- Legal Topics
- Negligence, Contributory Negligence, Damages, Pedestrian Road Accidents
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Alison McDonald (AP)
Pursuer
Sarah Weir Chambers
Defender
Procedural Posture
Personal Injury Action / Judgment After Proof (trial)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defender was negligent in causing injury to the pursuer at a pedestrian crossing
- 2 Whether the pursuer was contributorily negligent
- 3 Assessment of damages for personal injuries
Ratio Decidendi
The defender was primarily at fault for failing to observe the changing traffic signals and take action to avoid the pursuer, but the pursuer was also at fault for stepping onto the crossing without ensuring it was safe. Liability apportioned two-thirds to the defender and one-third to the pursuer.
Court Disposition
Defender found liable for two-thirds of the pursuer's damages; pursuer found one-third contributorily negligent.
Orders
- Award of solatium (general damages) of £115,000 plus interest (£16,560)
- Past wage loss (including interest) of £50,000
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment