Cawkwell v East Calder District Homing Society Social Club & Ors [2000] ScotCS 144 (1 June 2000)

Cawkwell v East Calder District Homing Society Social Club & Ors [2000] ScotCS 144 (1 June 2000)

The defenders did not breach any duty of care owed to the pursuer. The system for controlling entry was maintained as required, there was no evidence of causation linking any alleged failures to the pursuer's injuries, and the steps taken to prevent violence were reasonable. Accordingly, the pursuer's claim fails.

Citation
[2000] ScotCS 144
Parties
Pursuer: Samuel Cawkwell; Defender: East Calder District Homing Society Social Club and Others
Jurisdiction
Scotland
Judgment Date
01 June 2000
Procedural Posture
Personal Injury Action / Judgment After Proof
Outcome
Pursuer's claim dismissed; defenders entitled to absolvitor.
Legal Topics
Negligence, Duty of Care, Causation, Damages, Club Liability
Tort Personal Injury Licensing Law Negligence Duty of Care Causation Damages Club Liability

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Samuel Cawkwell

Pursuer

East Calder District Homing Society Social Club and Others

Defender

Procedural Posture

Personal Injury Action / Judgment After Proof

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the defenders owed a duty of care to the pursuer as a club member
  2. 2 Whether the defenders failed to maintain a proper system for controlling entry to the club
  3. 3 Whether the defenders failed to take reasonable care to prevent violence within the club

Ratio Decidendi

The defenders did not breach any duty of care owed to the pursuer. The system for controlling entry was maintained as required, there was no evidence of causation linking any alleged failures to the pursuer's injuries, and the steps taken to prevent violence were reasonable. Accordingly, the pursuer's claim fails.

Court Disposition

Pursuer's claim dismissed; defenders entitled to absolvitor.