Wylie v Friel [2001] ScotCS 104 (4 May 2001)
The pursuer failed to prove on balance of probabilities that he was struck by the defender's car or that his injuries were caused by the defender's actions. The defender's evidence was preferred as credible and reliable. Accordingly, the action fails and decree of absolvitor is granted.
- Citation
- [2001] ScotCS 104
- Parties
- Pursuer: Gordon Wylie; Defender: George Friel
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 04 May 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Personal Injury Reparation / Judgment After Proof
- Outcome
- Action dismissed; decree of absolvitor granted in favour of defender.
- Legal Topics
- Negligence, Causation, Damages, Credibility of Witnesses
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Gordon Wylie
Pursuer
George Friel
Defender
Procedural Posture
Personal Injury Reparation / Judgment After Proof
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether defender negligently caused injury to pursuer
- 2 Whether pursuer's injuries were caused by defender's actions
- 3 Assessment of damages if liability established
Ratio Decidendi
The pursuer failed to prove on balance of probabilities that he was struck by the defender's car or that his injuries were caused by the defender's actions. The defender's evidence was preferred as credible and reliable. Accordingly, the action fails and decree of absolvitor is granted.
Court Disposition
Action dismissed; decree of absolvitor granted in favour of defender.
Orders
- Third and fourth pleas-in-law for defender upheld
- Decree of absolvitor granted
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment