McCabe & Anor v. Fife Council [2005] ScotSC 90 (01 December 2005)

McCabe & Anor v. Fife Council [2005] ScotSC 90 (01 December 2005)

The pursuers' pleadings failed to specify any special circumstances, prior complaints, or facts distinguishing the locus from other high-priority footways, and did not set out a factual basis for any alleged breach of duty. As such, the action was bound to fail and was dismissed as irrelevant.

Citation
[2005] ScotSC 90
Parties
Pursuer: Ann Fraser McCabe or Coltart and Mr Andrew Walker, joint Guardians of Stuart Andrew Coltart; Defender: Fife Council
Jurisdiction
Scotland
Judgment Date
01 December 2005
Procedural Posture
Damages at Common Law / Interlocutor on Relevancy; Dismissal at Preliminary Stage
Outcome
Action dismissed as irrelevant.
Legal Topics
Negligence, Duty of Care, Roads Authority Liability, Winter Maintenance, Specification of Pleadings
Tort Local Government Law Negligence Duty of Care Roads Authority Liability Winter Maintenance Specification of Pleadings

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 11 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ann Fraser McCabe or Coltart and Mr Andrew Walker, joint Guardians of Stuart Andrew Coltart

Pursuer

Fife Council

Defender

Procedural Posture

Damages at Common Law / Interlocutor on Relevancy; Dismissal at Preliminary Stage

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the pursuers' pleadings disclosed a relevant case of negligence against the local authority for failure to treat a footway affected by snow and ice.
  2. 2 Whether the defenders breached a duty of care in the implementation of their winter maintenance plan.

Ratio Decidendi

The pursuers' pleadings failed to specify any special circumstances, prior complaints, or facts distinguishing the locus from other high-priority footways, and did not set out a factual basis for any alleged breach of duty. As such, the action was bound to fail and was dismissed as irrelevant.

Court Disposition

Action dismissed as irrelevant.

Orders

  • Sustains the defenders' first plea-in-law.
  • Dismisses the action as irrelevant.