Lindsay v. Walker [2007] ScotSC 28 (15 June 2007)

Lindsay v. Walker [2007] ScotSC 28 (15 June 2007)

The pursuer suffered neck, back, and knee injuries as a result of the defender's admitted negligence. The Sheriff found the pursuer credible regarding the duration of his symptoms, particularly the back injury, which persisted until July 2006. The appropriate award for solatium, including interest, is £2,650.

Citation
[2007] ScotSC 28
Parties
Pursuer: Alexander Lindsay; Defender: William Walker
Jurisdiction
Scotland
Judgment Date
15 June 2007
Procedural Posture
Personal Injury Claim (road Traffic Accident) / Judgment After Proof (trial)
Outcome
Pursuer awarded £2,650 with interest at 8% per annum from judgment until payment; expert witnesses certified; hearing on expenses fixed.
Legal Topics
Negligence, Damages, Road Traffic Accident, Whiplash, Soft Tissue Injury

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 12 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Alexander Lindsay

Pursuer

William Walker

Defender

Procedural Posture

Personal Injury Claim (road Traffic Accident) / Judgment After Proof (trial)

  1. 1 Whether the defender's admitted negligence caused the pursuer's injuries
  2. 2 Extent and duration of the pursuer's injuries attributable to the accident
  3. 3 Appropriate quantum of damages for pain and suffering

Ratio Decidendi

The pursuer suffered neck, back, and knee injuries as a result of the defender's admitted negligence. The Sheriff found the pursuer credible regarding the duration of his symptoms, particularly the back injury, which persisted until July 2006. The appropriate award for solatium, including interest, is £2,650.

Court Disposition

Pursuer awarded £2,650 with interest at 8% per annum from judgment until payment; expert witnesses certified; hearing on expenses fixed.

Orders

  • Pursuer's pleas-in-law 1 and 2 sustained to the extent of the sum awarded
  • Defender's third plea-in-law repelled except as to the extent of the sum awarded