BJ & Ors v HG & Ors [2014] ScotCS CSOH_2 (14 January 2014)
The defenders failed to provide a credible and acceptable non-negligent account of how the accident occurred. The first defender's explanation was not accepted. The presumption of negligence therefore applies, and the pursuers are entitled to reparation from the defenders.
- Citation
- [2014] ScotCS CSOH_2
- Parties
- Pursuers: BJ and Others; Defenders: HG and Others
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 14 January 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Damages (personal Injury/fatal Accident) / Judgment After Proof (trial)
- Outcome
- Decree granted in favour of the pursuers for the agreed sums of damages.
- Legal Topics
- Negligence, Presumption of Negligence, Burden of Proof, Motor Vehicle Accident, Direct Insurer Liability
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
BJ and Others
Pursuers
HG and Others
Defenders
Procedural Posture
Civil Damages (personal Injury/fatal Accident) / Judgment After Proof (trial)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defenders provided a non-negligent account to rebut the presumption of negligence arising from the accident circumstances
- 2 Whether the first defender's account of the accident was credible and reliable
Ratio Decidendi
The defenders failed to provide a credible and acceptable non-negligent account of how the accident occurred. The first defender's explanation was not accepted. The presumption of negligence therefore applies, and the pursuers are entitled to reparation from the defenders.
Court Disposition
Decree granted in favour of the pursuers for the agreed sums of damages.
Orders
- Decree for payment of agreed damages to each pursuer as per the joint minute.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment