GRACIE, BRIAN ALEXANDER GRACIE AGAINST CITY OF EDINBURGH COUNCIL [2019] ScotCS CSOH_6 (24 January 2019)
The pursuer's pleadings are insufficient in law to establish a relevant case of fault or to justify postponement of the limitation period under section 17(2)(b) of the 1973 Act. The action is both irrelevant and time-barred and must be dismissed.
- Citation
- [2019] ScotCS CSOH_6
- Parties
- Pursuer: Brian Alexander Gracie; Defender: City of Edinburgh Council
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 24 January 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Personal Injury Action / Procedure Roll Debate (motion to Dismiss)
- Outcome
- Action dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Negligence, Duty of Care, Limitation Periods, Time Bar, School Liability
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Brian Alexander Gracie
Pursuer
City of Edinburgh Council
Defender
Procedural Posture
Personal Injury Action / Procedure Roll Debate (motion to Dismiss)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the pursuer has pled a relevant case of breach of duty against the defender
- 2 Whether the pursuer has pled a relevant case that he was not aware, and could not reasonably have become aware, of the material facts until a date less than 3 years before the action was raised
Ratio Decidendi
The pursuer's pleadings are insufficient in law to establish a relevant case of fault or to justify postponement of the limitation period under section 17(2)(b) of the 1973 Act. The action is both irrelevant and time-barred and must be dismissed.
Court Disposition
Action dismissed
Orders
- Sustain defender’s first and second pleas-in-law (time bar and relevancy)
- Dismiss the action
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment