John Good against West Bay Insurance Plc (Sheriff Court Civil) [2025] SCAIR 70 (04 June 2025

John Good against West Bay Insurance Plc (Sheriff Court Civil) [2025] SCAIR 70 (04 June 2025

The court found the pursuer to be a credible and reliable witness and accepted his account that he was standing on the steps of the lorry when the motorcycle struck, causing him to lose balance and fall, resulting in injury. The defender's insured was found negligent, and the defenders liable under the EC (Rights against Insurers) Regulations 2002. The pursuer's expert evidence was admissible and supported the mechanism and duration of injury. The defender's expert evidence was given minimal weight due to methodological deficiencies. Damages were assessed holistically at £3,216 plus interest.

Citation
[2025] SCAIR 70
Parties
Pursuer: John Good; Defender: West Bay Insurance Plc
Jurisdiction
Scotland
Procedural Posture
Sheriff Court Civil / Judgment After Trial
Outcome
Decree for pursuer; defenders liable for damages and interest.
Legal Topics
Negligence, Motor Vehicle Accident, Expert Evidence, Damages, Rights Against Insurers
Personal Injury Insurance Law Negligence Motor Vehicle Accident Expert Evidence Damages Rights Against Insurers

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 10 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

John Good

Pursuer

West Bay Insurance Plc

Defender

Procedural Posture

Sheriff Court Civil / Judgment After Trial

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the pursuer was standing on the steps of the lorry or inside the cab at the time of impact
  2. 2 Whether the collision caused sufficient force to cause the pursuer to lose balance and fall
  3. 3 Admissibility and weight of expert evidence on causation and injury

Ratio Decidendi

The court found the pursuer to be a credible and reliable witness and accepted his account that he was standing on the steps of the lorry when the motorcycle struck, causing him to lose balance and fall, resulting in injury. The defender's insured was found negligent, and the defenders liable under the EC (Rights against Insurers) Regulations 2002. The pursuer's expert evidence was admissible and supported the mechanism and duration of injury. The defender's expert evidence was given minimal weight due to methodological deficiencies. Damages were assessed holistically at £3,216 plus interest.

Court Disposition

Decree for pursuer; defenders liable for damages and interest.

Orders

  • Defenders to pay £3,216 to pursuer with interest at 8% from date of decree until payment.
  • Sanction for instruction of Junior Counsel/Solicitor Advocate under section 108 of the Court Reform (Scotland) Act 2014.