Muhammad Suleman against One Insurance LTD (Sheriff Court Civil) [2025] SCGLA 88 (10 October 2025)
The court found, on the balance of probabilities, that the defender's insured negligently collided with the pursuer's stationary vehicle, causing minor but genuine soft tissue injuries to the pursuer, and that the pursuer was entitled to damages for pain, suffering, and reasonable expenses, but not for unrelated pre-existing vehicle damage.
- Citation
- [2025] SCGLA 88
- Parties
- Pursuer: Muhammad Suleman; Defender: One Insurance LTD
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 10 October 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Personal Injury (road Traffic Accident) / Judgment After Summary Cause Proof
- Outcome
- Decree for the pursuer
- Legal Topics
- Negligence, Road Traffic Accident, Damages, Solatium, Causation, Rights Against Insurers
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Muhammad Suleman
Pursuer
One Insurance LTD
Defender
Procedural Posture
Personal Injury (road Traffic Accident) / Judgment After Summary Cause Proof
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a collision occurred between the pursuer's and defender's insured's vehicles
- 2 Whether the collision caused the pursuer's alleged injuries
- 3 Whether the pursuer is entitled to damages for personal injury and related losses
Ratio Decidendi
The court found, on the balance of probabilities, that the defender's insured negligently collided with the pursuer's stationary vehicle, causing minor but genuine soft tissue injuries to the pursuer, and that the pursuer was entitled to damages for pain, suffering, and reasonable expenses, but not for unrelated pre-existing vehicle damage.
Court Disposition
Decree for the pursuer
Orders
- Defender to pay pursuer £2,184.72 with interest at 8% per annum until payment
- Dr Michael Foxworthy certified as a skilled witness for the pursuer
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment