Hamilton's Tutors, Petitioners [1924] ScotLR 277 (02 February 1924)
The Court held that the unique and compelling circumstances—namely, the destitution and infancy of the next heir, the ample resources of the ward's estate, the prior recognition of a natural duty by the ward's father and grandmother, and the urgency created by the war—justified granting ex post facto sanction for the payments made by the tutors. The general rule against such payments was not absolute and could be relaxed in exceptional cases such as this.
- Citation
- [1924] ScotLR 277
- Parties
- Petitioners: Robert Robertson Shersby Harvie Brownlee and others (Hamilton's Tutors); Ward: Miss Elspeth Mary Campbell Hamilton; Beneficiary (cousin/next Heir): James Leslie Campbell Henderson Hamilton
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 02 February 1924
- Procedural Posture
- Petition (note for Sanction) / Inner House, Second Division, Court of Session – Decision on Reported Note
- Outcome
- First crave of the note granted; ex post facto sanction for payments made for maintenance of the ward's cousin allowed.
- Legal Topics
- Nobile Officium, Tutor Nominate, Ex Post Facto Sanction, Alimentary Payments From Ward's Estate, Maintenance of Destitute Relatives
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Robert Robertson Shersby Harvie Brownlee and others (Hamilton's Tutors)
Petitioners
Miss Elspeth Mary Campbell Hamilton
Ward
James Leslie Campbell Henderson Hamilton
Beneficiary (cousin/next Heir)
Procedural Posture
Petition (note for Sanction) / Inner House, Second Division, Court of Session – Decision on Reported Note
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Court can sanction ex post facto payments from a ward's estate for the maintenance of a destitute cousin/next heir where there is no legal obligation of aliment.
- 2 Whether exceptional circumstances justify a departure from the general rule against such payments.
Ratio Decidendi
The Court held that the unique and compelling circumstances—namely, the destitution and infancy of the next heir, the ample resources of the ward's estate, the prior recognition of a natural duty by the ward's father and grandmother, and the urgency created by the war—justified granting ex post facto sanction for the payments made by the tutors. The general rule against such payments was not absolute and could be relaxed in exceptional cases such as this.
Court Disposition
First crave of the note granted; ex post facto sanction for payments made for maintenance of the ward's cousin allowed.
Orders
- Direct the Lord Ordinary to grant the crave in branch (1) of the prayer of the note.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment