Finlayson & Ors v Turnbull & Ors [2001] ScotCS 262 (14 November 2001)
Defenders are liable to account for fees legitimately exigible for pre-dissolution work, regardless of receipt; exclusion of files requires fair notice and proof, which was not provided; pursuers entitled to valuation of specified files.
- Citation
- [2001] ScotCS 262
- Parties
- Pursuers: Archibald Fraser Finlayson and Others; Defenders: Robert White Turnbull and Others
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 14 November 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Partnership Dispute / Proof Before Answer, Restricted to Schedule 14
- Outcome
- Pursuers' objections to item 14 sustained in part; decree for payment granted.
- Legal Topics
- Obligation to Account, Fiduciary Duties, Legal Aid Fees, Valuation of Partnership Assets
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Archibald Fraser Finlayson and Others
Pursuers
Robert White Turnbull and Others
Defenders
Procedural Posture
Civil Partnership Dispute / Proof Before Answer, Restricted to Schedule 14
Legal Issues
- 1 Scope of defenders' liability to account for pre-dissolution fees
- 2 Validity and valuation of 'Caroline Thomson' files
- 3 Entitlement to account for 'Settled Direct' cases
Ratio Decidendi
Defenders are liable to account for fees legitimately exigible for pre-dissolution work, regardless of receipt; exclusion of files requires fair notice and proof, which was not provided; pursuers entitled to valuation of specified files.
Court Disposition
Pursuers' objections to item 14 sustained in part; decree for payment granted.
Orders
- Item 14 of defenders' Account corrected to £2,139.37 instead of £0.00.
- Decree for payment of £2,139.37 to pursuers granted, subject to further hearing on timing.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment