DUTHIE AGAINST TRANSCOCEAN NORTH SEA Ltd & Ors [2015] ScotCS CSOH_20 (17 February 2015)
Summary decree refused in hoc statu as the statutory case is not properly focused; there is an arguable case in law and an arguable defence. Major issue on causation requires proof.
- Citation
- [2015] ScotCS CSOH_20
- Parties
- Pursuer: Michael Duthie; First Defender: Transocean North Sea Limited; Second Defender: Dr Johnson; Third Defender: Capita Health Solutions Limited; Fourth Defender: Transocean Drilling UK Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 17 February 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Personal Injury Action / Motion for Summary Decree Under RCS 21
- Outcome
- Motion for summary decree refused in hoc statu
- Legal Topics
- Offshore Installations, Provision of Medical Equipment, First Aid Regulations, Causation, Summary Decree
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Michael Duthie
Pursuer
Transocean North Sea Limited
First Defender
Dr Johnson
Second Defender
Capita Health Solutions Limited
Third Defender
Transocean Drilling UK Limited
Fourth Defender
Procedural Posture
Personal Injury Action / Motion for Summary Decree Under RCS 21
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether fourth defenders breached statutory duty by failing to provide adequate ECG equipment
- 2 Whether breach caused pursuer's injury
- 3 Interpretation of 'adequate and appropriate' under Offshore Installations and Pipeline Works (First Aid) Regulations 1988
Ratio Decidendi
Summary decree refused in hoc statu as the statutory case is not properly focused; there is an arguable case in law and an arguable defence. Major issue on causation requires proof.
Court Disposition
Motion for summary decree refused in hoc statu
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment